AGRIS

Data provider:

Icon data provider

The National Agricultural Library is one of four national libraries of the United States, with locations in Beltsville, Maryland and Washington, D.C. It houses one of the world's largest and most accessible agricultural information collections and serves as the nexus for a national network of state land-grant and U.S. Department of Agriculture field libraries. In fiscal year 2011 (Oct 2010 through Sept 2011) NAL delivered more than 100 million direct customer service transactions.

Active (Data provider submitted metadata in the last calendar year)
Journal Article

Journal Article

note on the force of whip impacts delivered by jockeys using forehand and backhand strikes  [2013]

McGreevy, Paul D.; Hawson, Lesley A.; Salvin, Hannah; McLean, Andrew N.;

Access the full text

The Australian Racing Board makes a distinction under its Rules of Racing concerning whip use between forehand and backhand whip action that is critically important: before the final 100 m of a race, the whip shall be used in a forehand manner neither in consecutive strides nor on more than 5 occasions. This seems to imply that backhand whip use is less closely scrutinized, which may have profound implications for horse welfare. We used pressure-detection pads to examine the force on the impact of 288 whip strikes (left forehand, left backhand, right forehand, and right backhand; n = 72 each) in batches of 12 consecutive strikes by 6 right-handed jockeys based in Victoria, a state in which thoroughbred racing is always conducted in a counterclockwise direction. The mean latency (±standard error of the mean) to complete each series of 12 strikes was 6.89 ± 0.44 seconds. The mean for force was 46.90 ± 5.39 N. Significant differences in force emerged between individual jockeys and in most interactions between jockey, hand and action. This highlights the problems the industry has in trying to enforce equity in whip use to satisfy punters while at the same time giving reassurances about horse welfare. The current results show that action (forehand vs. backhand) does not influence force on impact when using the nondominant hand. However, when using the dominant hand, these jockeys struck with more force in the backhand (P = 0.02). This result challenges the curr
ent focus on welfare concerns around forehand whip strikes. It should inform any review of the rules around whip use because it may help to avoid any unjustified focus on either forehand whip use or backhand whip use. This would help to inform the debate around levels of impact on fatigued horses when they are being struck for a perceived sporting gain.
From the journal
Journal of veterinary behavior
ISSN : 1558-7878

Bibliographic information

Language:
English
Type:
Journal Article
In AGRIS since:
2015
Volume:
8
Issue:
5
Start Page:
395
End Page:
399
Publisher:
Elsevier Inc.
All titles:
"note on the force of whip impacts delivered by jockeys using forehand and backhand strikes"@eng
Loading...

Bibliographic information

Language:
English
Type:
Journal Article
In AGRIS since:
2015
Volume:
8
Issue:
5
Start Page:
395
End Page:
399
Publisher:
Elsevier Inc.
All titles:
"note on the force of whip impacts delivered by jockeys using forehand and backhand strikes"@eng