Trends in indoor–outdoor PM2.5 research: A systematic review of studies conducted during the last decade (2003–2013)

There has been growing concern about potential health risks from exposure to PM2.5 (fine particulate matter). The importance of conducting simultaneous indoor and outdoor measurements emerged because people, especially in developed countries, spend more than 90% of their time indoors. Great spatial and temporal variations in human exposure to PM2.5 have recently been reported. This review aims to identify the main research areas that have attracted recent attention, any possible gaps in the measurements of PM2.5 in various microenvironments, and the relationships between indoor and outdoor concentrations. This study also provides recommendations for further studies on PM2.5 measurement methods and exposure levels. To achieve these goals, this review included articles published online from 2003 to 2013 in the Science Direct and Web of Science databases. In the initial screening stage, 113 abstracts selected while 61 articles were remained for full review. The reviewed studies consistently showed positive correlations between indoor and outdoor PM2.5. Sulfate/sulfur concentrations were used intensively for calculating the infiltration factor (FINF). The higher FINF indicated high infiltration of outdoor PM2.5 into indoor areas. Great percentage (42%) of the reviewed filter–based studies was conducted in Europe, followed by a similar amount (38%) in the USA, and 20% in Asia, indicating a lack in PM2.5 research in other parts of the world. It was difficult to conclude that ambient fixed–site monitoring provided accurate estimations of actual exposure to PM2.5– Studies shown trends of higher personal concentrations compared to indoor and outdoor ones. Higher indoor levels of OC (organic carbon), compared to outdoor levels, were consistently reported. The opposite trend was true for EC (elemental carbon), and there were higher indoor OC/EC ratios than outdoor OC/EC ratios. There was a consistent general trend of a high (r>0.70) correlation between indoor and outdoor EC, while the correlation between indoor and outdoor OC was much weaker (r=022–0.75). The higher indoor OC/EC ratios, compared to the outdoor OC/EC ratios, reflects multiple sources of indoor OC. Sulfate (SO42–), nitrate (NO3–), and ammonium (NH4+) were primary contributors to PM2.5 mass.