Comparison of four immune variables and pulmonary lesions of goats with intrapulmonary exposure and subsequent intrathoracic challenge exposure with Pasteurella haemolytica

A comparison of immune variables following lung sensitization with live Pasteurella haemolytica serotype 1 (Ph1)-impregnated agar beads was done in 2 separate trials. The Ph1 immune variables studied were blood bactericidal activity, serum bacteriolysis, total classical complement, and indirect hemagglutination antibody. Each trial had 16 male weanling goats: 6 controls and 10 principals. In trial 1, each goat was surgically catheterized through the trachea, then the material was deposited in a bronchus. The controls received only agar beads and the principals received agar beads impregnated with live Ph1. These goats were studied for 32 days, euthanatized, and necropsied. In trial 2, the controls were each transthoracically injected with agar beads into the left lung and the principals were similarly injected with agar beads impregnated with live Ph1. These goats were studied for 35 days, then challenge exposed transthoracically by injection of Ph1 in saline solution (1.2 X 10(7) CFU/ml) into the right lung. Four days later, they were euthanatized and necropsied. The volume of lung consolidated tissue was an excellent measure of Ph1 immunity. Principal goats generated solid protective immunity to subsequent challenge exposure because minimal or no lung consolidation was observed, whereas large volumes of lung consolidation were seen in the controls. The principal goats in trial 1 gave a weak serum indirect hemagglutination Ph1 antibody response, which was attributed to the bronchial method of depositing the Ph1. The corresponding response of the control group remained negative. The Ph1 agar beads (1 X 10(6) CFU in 0.5 ml) protected the bacteria from immediate phagocytosis and lysis as indicated by the induced pneumonic deaths of 2 principals 5 days later. Also, live Ph1 were isolated on day 32 during necropsy of respiratory tracts of 3 principals. At necropsy, no Ph1 isolates were found in the controls. Bacteriolytic activity was not induced against Ph1 in either control or principal groups in this trial. the study, but antibody titers of the principals increased to a geometric mean of 1:250 seven days after lung injection (1 X 10(5) CFU in 0.5 ml). Serum bacteriolytic titers on day 0 indicated that both principals and controls could be subgrouped to high or low subgroups on the basis of their bacteriolytic activity. The bacteriolytic activities of the controls remained unchanged during the experiment, and neither control subgroup was protected from Ph1 challenge exposure. Bacteriolytic activities of the high and low principal subgroups responded differently to Ph1 agar bead lung injection, but both principal subgroups were protected from lung challenge exposure. The low principal subgroup generated high titers of indirect hemagglutination Ph1 antibody, whereas, the high principal subgroup generated lower antibody titers. Total complement, serum bacteriolytic, and blood bactericidal profiles were similar in the principal group with high bacteriolytic activity. The immune factors that protected 2 principal subgroups did not appear to be associated with Ph1 serum bacteriolysis.