Comparative in vitro efficacy of antimicrobial shampoos: a pilot study
2012
Young, Rebecca | Buckley, Laura | McEwan, Neil | Nuttall, Tim
This study compared the antimicrobial efficacy of shampoos against meticillin‐sensitive Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MSSP), meticillin‐resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP), antibiotic‐sensitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), multidrug‐resistant P. aeruginosa (MDR‐PA) and Malassezia pachydermatis. Three isolates were incubated for 10, 30 and 60 min with each shampoo diluted in phosphate‐buffered saline. Aliquots were then incubated for 16–18 h on sheep blood agar (bacteria) or for 3 days on Sabouraud’s dextrose agar (Malassezia). The minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) for chlorhexidine products (Malaseb®, Pyoderm®/Microbex® and Hibiscrub®) were 1:1,024–1:2,048 for MSSP and MRSP, 1:512–1:1,024 for PA and MDR‐PA, and 1:2,048–1:5,096 for Malassezia at all time points. The MBCs for benzoyl peroxide (Paxcutol®) for MSSP and MRSP were 1:2–1:8 at 10 min, and 1:256 after 30 and 60 min. A 1:2 dilution was effective against Pseudomonas, and 1:512–1:1,024 dilutions were effective against Malassezia at all time points. The MBCs for ethyl lactate (Etiderm®) for MSSP and MRSP were 1:2 at 10 min, and 1:2–1:16 after 30 and 60 min. A 1:2 dilution was effective against Pseudomonas, and a 1:512 dilution was effective against Malassezia at all time points. Chloroxylenol (Coatex®) and acetic acid–boric acid (Malacetic®) were not effective against MSSP, MRSP or Pseudomonas. Both were effective against Malassezia at 1:8–1:16 dilution at 10 min, and at 1:8–1:32 dilution after 30 and 60 min. In conclusion, chlorhexidine appeared to be the most effective topical biocide, and MRSP and MDR‐PA were no less susceptible than antibiotic‐sensitive organisms. These results should, however, be confirmed with larger numbers of isolates.
اظهر المزيد [+] اقل [-]الكلمات المفتاحية الخاصة بالمكنز الزراعي (أجروفوك)
المعلومات البيبليوغرافية
تم تزويد هذا السجل من قبل National Agricultural Library