Efficacy of fumigant treatments and inoculum placement on control of Macrophomina phaseolina in strawberry beds

Soil disinfestation is one of the main concerns of strawberry growers. The phased-out of methyl bromide (MeBr) and the lack of equally effective fumigants has increased the difficulty in controlling soilborne pathogens such as Macrophomina phaseolina, causal agent of charcoal rot. Soil fumigant treatments were tested in Dover, Florida during the 2012–13, 2013–14 and 2014–15 seasons. The treatments included MeBr as a standard and common alternatives such as chloropicrin (PIC), 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3D), dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), potassium N-methyldithiocarbamate (Kpam) and sodium methyldithiocarbamate (Vapam). The efficacy of different fumigation rates and application methods was also investigated. Treatment effects were evaluated using sclerotia of M. phaseolina buried in bags 7.6 and 20.3 cm deep in the center of the bed, or 7.6 cm deep on the side of the bed (7.6 s). Additionally, strawberry crowns infected with M. phaseolina were buried 7.6 cm deep in the center of the bed during the 2012–13 and 2013–14 growing seasons. At the end of the 2013–14 and 2014–15 growing seasons, plant mortality and charcoal rot incidence (%) were also determined. Except for 1,3-dichloropropene:chloropicrin 39/60, most treatments were effective in reducing the colony forming units (CFUs) of M. phaseolina in buried bags or crowns buried at the center of the bed and reduced percent of charcoal rot incidence each season. Most treatments applied by shank produced similar reductions in inoculum levels at the center and sides of the bed, whereas drip treatments effectively reduced inoculum in bags buried at both depths in the center of the bed, but not at the side of the bed. Thus, one of the main problems of the current fumigants is poor distribution in the soil beds and strawberry growers should consider application methods that will achieve a more uniform distribution of the fumigants.