Mapping farm animal welfare education at university level in Europe
2014
Illmann, Gudrun | Keeling, Linda | Melisová, Michala | Ilieski, V. | Wincler, C. | Kostal, Lubomir | Meunier-Salaün, Marie-Christine | Spoolder, Hans | Fthenakis, G. | Department of Ethology ; Institute of Animal Science | Department of Animal Environment and Health ; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences = Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet (SLU) | Department of Functional Morphology ; Faculty of Veterinay Medicine | Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, Division of Livestock Sciences ; Universität für Bodenkultur Wien = University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences [Vienne, Autriche] (BOKU) | Institute of Animal Biochemistry and Genetics ; Slovak Academy of Science [Bratislava] (SAS) | Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage [Rennes] (PEGASE) ; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST | Livestock Research ; Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR) | Veterinary Faculty ; University of Thessaly [Volos] (UTH) | European Project: 265686
The aim of this study was to map farm animal welfare university education in an enlarged Europe with emphasis on identifyingexisting differences and gaps. Information on 210 courses dealing with farm animal welfare from 98 universities in 26 Europeancountries were obtained. Statistical analysis was carried out on 155 of these courses within animal science or veterinary programmes,at Bachelor and Master level and with the countries grouped into five regions (North West Europe, Mediterranean, West CentralEurope, East Central Europe and Balkans). There were significantly more hours of teaching in animal welfare in the North Westregion of Europe. This region also had more ‘interactive’ education methods, eg group discussion and farm visits, whereas WestCentral Europe had most ‘transmissive’ methods, eg lecturing. A course was more likely to be given in English in North West Europe(even when the UK and the Republic of Ireland were excluded from the analysis) and East Central Europe compared to West CentralEurope and the Balkans. There appeared to be no regional differences in the content of the courses although the focus was significantlymore ‘applied’, ie towards welfare assessment and legislation in the veterinary education and more ‘fundamental’, ie orientedtowards ethology, physiology and ethics, in the animal science education. In summary, the main differences in farm animal welfareeducation across Europe seem to be in the reduced number of hours of education, less interactive teaching and fewer courses inEnglish available to students outside the North West region.
اظهر المزيد [+] اقل [-]الكلمات المفتاحية الخاصة بالمكنز الزراعي (أجروفوك)
المعلومات البيبليوغرافية
تم تزويد هذا السجل من قبل Institut national de la recherche agronomique
