Co-production opportunities seized and missed in decision-support frameworks for climate-change adaptation in agriculture – How do we practice the “best practice”?
2023
Dolinska, Aleksandra | Hassenforder, Emeline | Loboguerrero, Ana Maria | Sultan, Benjamin | Bossuet, Jérôme | Cottenceau, Jeanne | Bonatti, Michelle | Hellin, Jon | Mekki, Insaf | Drogoul, Alexis | Vadez, Vincent | Lisode | Gestion de l'Eau, Acteurs, Usages (UMR G-EAU) ; Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-AgroParisTech-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Montpellier ; Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro) | Département Environnements et Sociétés (Cirad-ES) ; Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad) | Université de Montpellier (UM) | Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie (INAT) | UMR 228 Espace-Dev, Espace pour le développement ; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université de Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD)-Avignon Université (AU)-Université de La Réunion (UR)-Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie (UNC)-Université de Guyane (UG)-Université des Antilles (UA)-Université de Montpellier (UM) | Independent Consultant | Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) | Institut National de Recherche en Génie Rural Eaux et Forêts (INRGREF) ; Ecole Nationale du Génie Rural, des Eaux et des Forêts (ENGREF)-Institution de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement Supérieur Agricoles [Tunis] (IRESA) | Unité de modélisation mathématique et informatique des systèmes complexes [Bondy] (UMMISCO) ; Université Gaston Berger de Saint-Louis Sénégal (UGB)-Université de Yaoundé I (UY1)-Institut de la francophonie pour l'informatique-Université Cadi Ayyad [Marrakech] (UCA)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [Ile-de-France])-Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar [Sénégal] (UCAD) | Thuyloi University | Diversité, adaptation, développement des plantes (UMR DIADE) ; Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [Occitanie])-Université de Montpellier (UM) | LMI Adaptation des Plantes et microorganismes associés aux Stress Environnementaux [Dakar] (LAPSE) ; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) | Centre d'Etude Regional Pour l'Amelioration de l'Adaptation A la Secheresse (CERAAS) | Institut sénégalais de recherches agricoles [Dakar] (ISRA) | International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics [Inde] (ICRISAT) ; Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research [CGIAR] (CGIAR)
International audience
اظهر المزيد [+] اقل [-]إنجليزي. To contribute to building sustainable and effective climate change adaptation solutions avoiding usability gap, it is largely recommended to engage in the process of co-production, integrating expertise and knowledge from various academic and non-academic actors.OBJECTIVE: We want to learn if and how co-production, believed to effectively link knowledge and decision -making, and thus suggested as the best practice in building decision-support frameworks, is really applied in the frameworks that are being implemented on the ground.METHODS: A literature review allowed us to identify integrated decision-support frameworks for climate-change adaptation in agriculture developed and used over the period of the last 10 years and involving non-academic stakeholders. To analyse them, we chose as an assessment tool the four co-production principles proposed by Norstro center dot m and colleagues: context-based, pluralistic, goal-oriented and interactive.RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The useful entry points for incorporating co-production in the design of decision -support that we found in the reviewed frameworks include among the others adequate participants selection strategy, building on existing interaction spaces, developing a theory of change with the participants, and involving participants in the design of different elements of the method. The architectures of the analyzed frameworks contained more elements that responded to pluralistic and interactive principles than to context -based and goal oriented principles, we have also identified gaps in the design, such as taking into account the personal characteristics of researchers that could strengthen a framework's implementation and its impact, or attempts at bridging different levels of decision making, to cover the triad of science, policy and practice. A detailed look at the decision-frameworks that are actually being applied allows for a critical reflection whether and how we as researchers use what we preach as an effective way of responding to sustainability challenges in agriculture. Co-production principles turn out to be a useful tool for analysis and we suggest they can be used as a check-list when designing decision-support frameworks for climate-change adaptation.SIGNIFICANCE: This papers offers useful examples of how to shift the research-led processes of decision-support towards more co-production with non-academic actors, to increase chances of bridging the gaps between science, policy and practice.
اظهر المزيد [+] اقل [-]المعلومات البيبليوغرافية
تم تزويد هذا السجل من قبل Institut national de la recherche agronomique