Assessing the Effect of Organoclays and Biochar on the Fate of Abscisic Acid in Soil

10 páginas.-- 6 figuras.-- 2 tablas.-- 56 referencias.-- The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03668

The potential use of allelopathic and signaling compounds as environmentally friendly agrochemicals is a subject of increasing interest, but the fate of these compounds once they reach the soil environment is poorly understood. This work studied how the sorption, persistence, and leaching of the two enantiomers of the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) in agricultural soil was affected by the amendments of two organoclays (SA-HDTMA and Cloi10) and a biochar derived from apple wood (BC). In conventional 24-h batch sorption experiments, higher affinity toward ABA enantiomers was displayed by SA-HDTMA followed by Cloi10 and then BC. Desorption could be ascertained only in BC, where ABA enantiomers presented difficulties to be desorbed. Dissipation of ABA in the soil was enantioselective with S-ABA being degraded more quickly than R-ABA, and followed the order unamended > Cloi10-amended > BC-amended > SA-HDTMA-amended soil for both enantiomers. Sorption determined during the incubation experiment indicated some loss of sorption capacity with time in organoclay-amended soil and increasing sorption in BC-amended soil, suggesting surface sorption mechanisms for organoclays and slow (potentially pore filling) kinetics in BC-amended soil. The leaching of ABA enantiomers was delayed after amendment of soil to an extent that depended on the amendment sorption capacity, and it was almost completely suppressed by addition of BC due to its irreversible sorption. Organoclays and BC affected differently the final behavior and enantioselectivity of ABA in soil as a consequence of dissimilar sorption capacities and alterations in sorption with time, which will affect the plant and microbial availability of endogenous and exogenous ABA in the rhizosphere.

This work has been financed by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO Project AGL2014- 51897-R), EU FACCE-JPI (Designchar4food Project), and Junta de Andalucıa (P011-AGR-7400 and Research Group ́ AGR-264), cofinanced with European FEDER funds. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this paper is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Agricultural Research Service, or the Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologıa de Sevilla ́ (IRNAS-CSIC) of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable

Peer reviewed