As the result of the studies on the condition of protective belts of drainage channels (PB) have shown, due to improving maintained and mechanical damaged protective belts large amounts of erosion products contained in surface water inflows the channel bed. Disorderly condition of protective belts does not correspond to the requirements of environment protection. Mechanical damages are often related to unsustainable human activity in the adjacent zone of a drainage channel. According to the principles of soil occurrence in the channel bed, four groups of damages might be distinguished: soil entrance into the channel during the tillage of a protective belt; inflow of washout products from the basin; scours of protective belts and washout of turf flumes of surface water discharge. The most frequent damages enhancing the washout of flumes and inflow of erosion products are total or partial tillage of the protective belt of a drainage channel. From the point of view of erosion process, the inflow of erosion products from the basin is considered as the most dangerous damages, which is inevitable when the width of protective belt is insufficient, particularly in places with deep turf flumes arranged.

The studies were carried out in two control profiles of the Graisupis ditch excavated 40 years ago and situated at the distance of 2.4 and 4.8 km from the outlet in the land of intensive farming in Kedainiai district. The study object contained mineral loam/sandy-loam soils on the flat relief. The areas of catchments in control profiles were 12.1 and 5.9 square km, the largest discharges of spring floods were 3.4 and 1.6 m**3sE-1. Cross-sectional parameters, grass characteristics and flow parameters were measured under the conditions of different discharges (6 replications in each control profile during the vegetation period and 4 replications in spring when the channel bed is clean). As the study results show, roughness coefficient of the grass-cowered channel bed increased up to 21 times, water tables were observed to be 20-40 cm higher, the outlets of the drainage were flooded up. Considering the average grass indices determined in control profiles, grass hydraulic resistance was calculated according to 4 formulas based on the scheme when grass cover resistance is estimated as the total resistance of separate obstructions. The difference of 22.3% between calculated results and natural measurements was determined. The formula estimating grass cover parameters as well as flow regime determined to be most suitable.