Forest Land Ownership Change in France. COST Action FP1201 - FACESMAP Country Report | Evolution de la propriété forestière en Europe. Action COST Facesmpa-Rapport pour la France

French. L'action Cost Facesmap fait le point sur les évolutions récentes de la propriété forestière dans les 27 pays de l'UE. Elle vise notamment à : - donner une vue générale de la propriété forestière en Europe et les changments récents intervenus dans les 27 pays de l'Union de puis 1991; - faire un état de l'art sur les publications récentes traitant de la propriété forestière et du comportement des propriétaires - d'approfondir la notion de "nouveaux propriétaires forestiers" , qu'il s'agisse de primo-accédants ou de propriétaires plus traditionnels mais dont les pratiques de gestion forestière ont évolué au cours des dernières décennies : - d'identifier les nouvelles formes d'entités juridiques ou non qui émergent dans différents pays européens. Ce rapport, co-écrit par des chercheurs d'Irstea et des chargés de mission du Centre national de la propriété forestière, expose plus spécifiquement le cas de la France.

English. Forest ownership is changing across Europe. In some areas a growing number of so-called “new” forest owners hold only small parcels, have no agricultural or forestry knowledge and no capacity or interest to manage their forests, while in others new community and private owners are bringing fresh interest and new objectives to woodland management. The European COST Action FP1201 FOREST LAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN EUROPE: SIGNIFICANCE FOR MANAGEMENT AND POLICY (FACESMAP) aims to bring together the state-of-knowledge in this field across Europe and can build on expertise from 30 participating countries. Drawing on an evidence review across these countries, the objectives of the Action are as follows: (1) To analyse attitudes and constraints of different forest owner types in Europe and the ongoing changes (outputs: literature survey, meta-analyses and maps). (2) To explore innovative management approaches for new forest owner types (outputs: case studies, critical assessment). (3) To study effective policy instruments with a comparative analysis approach (outputs: literature survey, case studies, policy analyses). (4) To draw conclusions and recommendations for forest-related policies, forest management practice, further education and future research. Part of the work of the COST Action is the collection of data into country reports. These are written following prepared guidelines and to a common structure in order to allow comparisons across the countries. The common work in all countries comprises of a collection of quantitative data as well as qualitative description of relevant issues. The COUNTRY REPORTS of the COST Action serve the following purposes: • Give an overview of forest ownership structures and respective changes in each country and insight on specific issues in the countries; • Provide data for some of the central outputs that are planned in the Action, including the literature reviews; • Provide information for further work in the Action, including sub-groups on specific topics. A specific focus of the COST Action is on new forest owner types. It is not so much about “new forest owners” in the sense of owners who have only recently acquired their forest, but the interest is rather on new types of ownership – owners with non-traditional goals of ownership and methods of management. For the purpose of the Action, a broad definition of “new forest owner types” was chosen. In a broad understanding of new or non-traditional forest ownership we include several characteristics as possible determinants of new forest owners. The following groups may all be determined to be new forest owners: (1) individuals or organizations that previously have not owned forest land, (2) traditional forest owner categories who have changed motives, or introduced new goals and/or management practices for their forests, (3) transformed public ownership categories (e.g., through privatisation, contracting out forest management, transfer to municipalities, etc.), and (4) new legal forms of ownership in the countries (e.g. new common property regimes, community ownership), both for private and state land.