Seismic line width and orientation influence microclimatic forest edge gradients and tree regeneration

Ecological impacts of linear anthropogenic disturbances may be underestimated due to edge effects extending into adjacent forests. Seismic lines are the most pervasive linear disturbance associated with oil and gas development in the boreal forests of western North America. The width and orientation of seismic lines may influence microclimatic edge effects that could alter biotic responses, including tree recruitment. We examined light intensity, air temperature, relative humidity, and tree regeneration within seismic lines and adjacent forests to: (1) compare abiotic conditions between wide (6–8 m) and narrow (3–4 m) seismic lines; (2) quantify microclimatic edge effects of seismic lines of different widths and orientations; and (3) relate patterns in tree regeneration density to local patterns in the abiotic environment. We sampled interior forests and 24 seismic lines that were wide or narrow and orientated east-west or north-south in poor mesic ecosites of northeast Alberta, Canada. Microclimatic conditions in seismic line centres were generally intermediate between interior forest and well pads, with narrow seismic lines more similar to interior forest and wide seismic lines more similar to well pads. Light intensity on wide seismic line centres was at least 1.5 times higher than on narrow seismic line centres and up to 3.8 times higher than interior forest. Edge effects on light intensity extended up to 10 m into the forest adjacent to wide lines, but were restricted to the forest edge (at the interface) of narrow lines. Compared to interior forest, day temperature was up to 2.8 °C and 0.8 °C higher at edges of wide and narrow seismic lines, respectively. Relative humidity during the day was up to 7.3% and 3% lower at the edges of wide and narrow seismic lines, respectively, as compared to interior forest. At night, wide seismic line centres were up to 1.7 °C cooler and up to 8.2% more humid than narrow seismic line centres. Tree regeneration was highest where light intensity was highest (the centre of wide north-south seismic lines) and a 10-fold increase in light intensity resulted in 5.8 times more regenerating trees. This study reveals that seismic line width and orientation affect abiotic factors within the linear disturbance and up to 10 m into the adjacent forest. Edge effects on the microclimate of seismic lines were most pronounced in wider seismic lines and along north (south-facing) forest edges. These findings provide a better understanding of the abiotic factors influencing biotic responses to linear anthropogenic disturbances.