Unraveling overprinted formation mechanisms of massive dolostone in the Lower Triassic sequence of an isolated carbonate platform in Nanpanjiang Basin, south China
2022
Li, Xiaowei | Lehrmann, Dan | Luczaj, John | Kelley, Brian M. | Cantrell, Dave L. | Yu, Meiyi | Ferrill, Nathaniel Ledbetter | Payne, Jonathan L.
Massive dolomitization is common in carbonate platforms but determining the causes of dolomitization remains challenging. A particular difficulty lies in identifying cases where petrographic and geochemical attributes of dolostone related to one mechanism could be obscured by a later, different one. To better understand whether traditional approaches are sufficient to unravel the origins of dolostone resulting from successive, different mechanisms, this study investigates the formation mechanism(s) of dolostone along a platform-to-basin transect of a Permian-Triassic isolated platform in the Nanpanjiang Basin. The dolostone in the Lower Triassic succession comprises three dolomite phases that can be distinguished through field relationships, petrography, ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr ratios, and microthermometry. Dolomite type 1 formed due to the reflux of platform-top evaporated seawater that flowed through the platform interior in the Early Triassic. Dolomite types 2 and 3 are interpreted to have formed at elevated temperatures during or after Late Triassic platform burial and to have played a secondary role in forming the dolostone. The dolomitizing fluids that resulted in the formation of dolomite types 2 and 3 were derived from Early Triassic seawater-like fluid that was expelled from the Lower Triassic basinal carbonate sediments and moved updip to the platform interior. Dolomitized clasts in partially or non-dolomitized slope breccias demonstrate pre-burial timing of dolomite type 1, and distinguish the earlier dolomitization from later, post-burial dolomitization represented by dolomite types 2 and 3. Dolomite type 1 retains its Early Triassic seawater δ¹³C and ⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr signatures, whereas overlapping geochemical fields of the three types of dolomite (trace element concentration, δ¹⁸O) imply that burial dolomitizing fluids locally reset the geochemistry of dolomite type 1. This finding suggests that the same dolomite archive may retain well-preserved or altered data depending on the specific geochemical proxy and that identifying individual dolomitization mechanisms using geochemical proxies is possible only in some cases.
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
This bibliographic record has been provided by National Agricultural Library