Energy expenditure of Angora bucks in peak breeding season estimated with the doubly-labeled water technique
1999
Toerien, C.A. | Sahlu, T. | Wong, W.W.
We used the doubly-labeled water (DLW; (2)H(2)(18)O) method to compare total energy expenditure (TEE) of Angora bucks and wethers over a 15-d period during peak breeding season. Four bucks (57 +/- 3 kg) and four wethers (45 +/- 2 kg) were fitted with marking harnesses to measure sexual activity and allocated pairwise to one of four breeding groups (n = 30 does/group). Subjects were infused i.v. with (2)H(2)(18)O that provided 200 mg (2)H(2)O and 250 mg H(2)(18)O/kg BW. Blood samples were collected over a 15-d period, with 3- to 4-d intervals for isotope enrichment measurements. Total DLW-derived energy expenditure (TEE) was similar (P = .55) between bucks and wethers (2,578 vs 2,365; SE 239 kcal/d). Large variation was observed among wethers in TEE, courtship, and attempted mountings. Total energy expended corrected for that in mohair production (CTEE) tended (P = .09) to be greater in sexually active wethers (133 +/- 8 kcal ME/[kg BW(.75)(.)d(-1)]; n = 3) than in bucks (110 +/- 7 kcal ME/[kg BW(.75)(.)d(-1)]; n = 4). Energy expended on activity (EE(a)) by these wethers was highly correlated (r = .98) with the number of does marked, which may explain high variability among wethers in EEa. Bucks marked more does (18 +/- 1; P < .05) than wethers (8 +/- 3), but a weak relationship (r = .36) existed between number of does marked and EE(a), suggesting individuality in style and persistence while courting. In Angora bucks, CTEE during the breeding season was 9% greater than the maintenance energy requirement. In conclusion, breeding activities in single-buck breeding groups did not markedly increase energy requirements of Angora bucks.
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
This bibliographic record has been provided by National Agricultural Library