Economic effects of pesticide regulation and farmers' education on rice production in Nueva Ecija, Philippines

Results of the study showed that insecticide use in the country has generally been increasing as indicated by rising imports and sales in the 1990s. Government tariff and pricing policies reduced the disincentive to use chemicals in agricultural production as indicated by decreasing implicit tariff; but provided higher potential incentive to domestic formulation as indicated by an increasing effective protection rate. Nevertheless, the government appeared to have been successful in minimizing the availability and use of extremely hazardous chemicals in favor of least toxic ones through regulation. At the farm level, regulation had changed the pattern of pesticide use of farmers from village Matingkis in Munoz, Nueva Ecija. There was a shift from monocrotophos and endosulfan to other chemicals of lower toxicity but this entailed higher volume to compensate for potency loss to attain the equivalent pest control. Farmers' education as a complementary policy had reduced pesticide use. The FFS [farmers' field school] in nearby Sto. Domingo, with and without regulation, used insecticide only as a last resort because of better understanding of threshold level. The aggregate cost of material inputs and net income above material cost of farmers were not reduced significantly. But if net income could be improved through appropriate input and pricing policies there would be incentive to continually adopt IPM [integrated pest management] technology rather than chemical control. In the long run, this could result to healthier population and safer environment. The favorable impact of education on yield was manifested using 1997 data. Yield could be enhanced through farmers' education based on the result of the estimated bio-economic and Cobb-Douglas production functions. Through time, farmers gained more knowledge and better understanding of the dynamics of the ecosystem that improved their decision-making to enhance yield. In view of the positive impact of farmers' education under continued regulation of harmful chemicals, the government needs to strengthen its efforts to educate more farmers from other areas and in other crops on IPM technology through FFS