Alternative methods for testing evaluators in sensory analyse | Využitie alternatívnych postupov pri testovaní hodnotiteľov v senzorickej analýze
2009
Václavová, A., Slovak Univ. of Agriculture in Nitra (Slovak Republic) | Vietoris, V., Slovak Univ. of Agriculture in Nitra (Slovak Republic) | Zajác, P., Slovak Univ. of Agriculture in Nitra (Slovak Republic) | Čapla, J., Slovak Univ. of Agriculture in Nitra (Slovak Republic) | Golian, J., Slovak Univ. of Agriculture in Nitra (Slovak Republic) | Maľa, P., Slovak Univ. of Agriculture in Nitra (Slovak Republic)
The experiment consisted of a color word reading and ink color naming tests based on the original Stroops tests. There were a total of 31 mistakes in the optical illusions made by the participants. The most errors occurred when defining brown color where the incidence ratio was 0,258. The probability of such a phenomenom was 9%. The least mistakes occurred when defining pink color, whit the incidnce ratio 0,0645. To sum up, accoding to our results of naming, basic colors we can say that students were wrong whendefining blue (0,258). And black color (0,258). The most errors were made at the end of optical illusin effect when defining pink color (0,37). Which was confused with red color. Probability of such a phenomenon was 9%. The lowest ratio was reached when defining red, white and yellow color 0,161.
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
This bibliographic record has been provided by Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Institute