Stability of genotyping target sequences of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis upon cultivation on different media, in vitro- and in vivo passage, and natural infection

Mycobacterium (M.) avium subsp. paratuberculosis – the causative agent of paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) – affects domestic and wild ruminants worldwide. Recently, different typing techniques have been combined to provide sufficient discriminatory power for the differentiation of isolates and for epidemiological studies.In order to challenge the reliability of this approach the stability of different M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis genotypes determined after primary isolation was investigated after sub-cultivation on six different media (A), twelve in vitro passages (B), or a singular in vivo passage (C). In addition, different isolates from a single animal or herd were investigated (D).Sub-cultures of type- and reference strains, re-isolated inoculation strain after in vivo passage, and 23 field isolates were genotyped by mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number of tandem-repeat (MIRU-VNTR)-, short-sequence-repeat (SSR)-, and IS900-based restriction-fragment length-polymorphism (IS900-RFLP)-analyses and compared with initial genotypes.MIRU-VNTR-alleles (at loci 292, X3, 25, 47, 7, and 32) were stable after in vitro cultivations and after animal passage. Results of SSR analysis at Locus 1 with 7G nucleotides and at Loci 8 and 9 (tri-nucleotides) were also stable. At Locus 2 9G repeats changed into 10G after goat passage. After in vitro subculture (A+B) but not after animal passage (C) IS900-RFLP-typing revealed changes of BstEII-patterns for 3 of 23 strains (including ATCC 19698). Multiple isolates from individual animals or from a single cattle herd with natural infection (D) which exhibited identical IS900-RFLP- and MIRU-VNTR- genotypes, showed different G repeat numbers at SSR locus 2. This implies strand slippage events during chromosomal duplication of bacteria in the course of bacterial spreading within hosts and herds. Consequently, SSR-Locus 2 is not suitable as genome marker for epidemiological studies.