Comparing the carbon footprints of urban and conventional agriculture
2024
Hawes, Jason | Goldstein, Benjamin | Newell, Joshua | Dorr, Erica | Caputo, Silvio | Fox-Kämper, Runrid | Grard, Baptiste | Ilieva, Rositsa | Fargue-Lelièvre, Agnès | Poniży, Lidia | Schoen, Victoria | Specht, Kathrin | Cohen, Nevin | University of Michigan [Ann Arbor] ; University of Michigan System | McGill University = Université McGill [Montréal, Canada] | Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires (SADAPT) ; AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | School of Architecture and Planning, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK | ILS - Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development | ISARA | Agroécologie et Environnement (AGE) ; ISARA | City University of New York [New York] (CUNY) | Faculty of Human Geography and Planning, Department of Integrated Geography, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland | Centre for Agroecology, Water, and Resilience (CAWR), Coventry University, Coventry, UK | ILS - Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development (ILS - Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development) ; ILS - Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development | ESRC (UK, grant no. ES/S002170/2), BMBF (Germany, grant no. 01LF1801A), ANR (France, grant no. ANR-17-SUGI-0001-01), NSF (USA, Belmont Forum 18929627), the National Science Centre (Poland, grant no. 2017/25/Z/HS4/03048) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (GA no. 730254) under the JPI Urban Europe’s call ‘SUGI FWE Nexus’ | Nature | ANR-17-SUGI-0001,FEW-meter,The FEW-meter : an integrative model to measure and improve urban agriculture, shifting it towards circular urban metabolism(2017)
International audience
Show more [+] Less [-]English. Urban agriculture (UA) is a widely proposed strategy to make cities and urban food systems more sustainable. Until now, we have lacked a comprehensive assessment of the environmental performance of UA relative to conventional agriculture, and results from earlier studies have been mixed. This is the first large-scale study to resolve this uncertainty across cities and types of UA, employing citizen science at 73 UA sites in Europe and the United States to compare UA products to food from conventional farms. Results reveal that the carbon footprint of food from UA is six times greater than conventional agriculture (420 gCO2e versus 70 gCO2e per serving). However, some UA crops (for example, tomatoes) and sites (for example, 25% of individually managed gardens) outperform conventional agriculture. These exceptions suggest that UA practitioners can reduce their climate impacts by cultivating crops that are typically greenhouse-grown or air-freighted, maintaining UA sites for many years, and leveraging circularity (waste as inputs).
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
This bibliographic record has been provided by Institut national de la recherche agronomique
