Comparison of vertical flow treatment wetlands to other treatment technologies in real operating conditions under tropical climate | Comparaison des filtres plantés de végétaux avec des procédés de traitement conventionnels en conditions réelles d'exploitation en climat tropical
2018
Lombard Latune, R. | Leriquier, F. | Oucacha, C. | Pelus, L. | Lacombe, Gérald | Molle, Pascal | Réduire, valoriser, réutiliser les ressources des eaux résiduaires (UR REVERSAAL) ; Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA) | Office de l'Eau Martinique | ETIAGE REMIRE MONTJOLY FRA ; Partenaires IRSTEA ; Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)
[Departement_IRSTEA]Ecotechnologies [TR1_IRSTEA]TED [ADD1_IRSTEA]Valoriser les effluents et déchets organiques
Show more [+] Less [-]International audience
Show more [+] Less [-]English. The main treatment technologies implemented in the French Overseas Territories are compared based on the analysis of self-monitoring database built for this study. Activated sludge is the most implemented but least reliable technology, due to sludge leakages noticeable on 10% of the campaigns. Algae growth limits facultative ponds performances. Settling troubles have been identified on rotative biological contactor. Vertical flow treatment wetlands show the best performances. Coefficient Of Reliability use and comparison with data from Brazil confirm those results.
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
This bibliographic record has been provided by Institut national de la recherche agronomique
