Technical report on the environmental monitoring of the cage area at the Source of the Nile (SON) Fish Farm for Quarter 2: April-June 2017

National Fisheries Resources Research Institute (NaFIRRI) undertakes quarterly monitoring of the water environment at Source of the Nile (SON) fish farm. The activity which is through a collaborative arrangement between SON fish farm and NaFIRRI aims at assessing possible changes in the water environment at SON cage area. The fish rearing activity at SON fish farm involves keeping fish in cages often under high stocking densities and feeding them on artificial feeds that are not the natural food eaten by wild fish. Cages being open systems means that all wastes such as faeces, uneaten feed and fish excretes such as ammonia are shed into the water column (Fernandes et al., 2001). The consequence is increased nutrient input which may result into high algal growth (bloom). Although this may mean more food available to primary consumers such as zooplankton, blooms caused by blue-green algae may be harmful as certain species are associated with production of toxins. In addition, the degradation of excessive phytoplankton biomass can lead to anoxic conditions in sediments underlying the cages thus changing the abundance and composition of the resident fauna. Napoleon Gulf being a shallow bay at the exit of River Nile from Lake Victoria harbours a wide variety of wild fish species that are cherished by riparian human populations. The wild fishes living close to cages are bound to be affected by activities associated with this method of fish farming. Cage farming is likely to affect the presence, abundance, diet and residence time of organisms in given vicinity (Carss, 1990; Dempster et al., 2002). Floating structures including cages may act as Fish Attracting Devices (FADs) and most pelagic fishes are known to be strongly attracted to floating objects (Freon and Dagorn, 2000; Castro et al., 2002). Wild fish could be attracted to these sites by for example plenty of food available to the cultured fishes (Bjordal & Skar, 1992). In the process, other ecological interactions between cultured and wild fish may be possible. Wild fish may also be instrumental in cleaning the environment close to the cages through eating any excess uneaten food left by cultured fishes. Caged fish under crowded conditions is susceptible to waterborne diseases and could infect wild fish or vice versa. While diseases breaking out among cultured fishes may be controlled through treatment, the wild fishes cannot undergo treatment and may thus spread diseases to other fishes, hence affecting yields from capture fishery. Furthermore, escape of cultured fish may cause genetic dilution hence decreasing genetic diversity of fish. These and other possible impacts of cages on the water environment may consequently result into conflicts 2 with other resource users especially due to deteriorating water quality and effect on wild fishes, consequently affecting the cage aquaculture industry. Therefore, the following were established as key parameters to be monitored: water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, water transparency, total suspended solids, nutrient status, algae, zooplankton, benthic macro invertebrates and fish communities. The present report presents field observations made at the two cage sites of Source of the Nile fish farm including upstream, downstream and reference points, for the second quarter (April to June) undertaken in June 2017. The report provides a scientific interpretation and discussion of the results with reference to possible impacts of the cage facilities on the water environment and the different aquatic biota in and around the fish cage site.