Diferenciación de la fuente de contaminación como herramienta para el mejoramiento de la calidad del agua.

Venegas, Camilo; Ruiz Suárez, Erika Johana

Diferenciación de la fuente de contaminación como herramienta para el mejoramiento de la calidad del agua. | Differentiation of the source as a tool for improving water quality

2016 | 2015 | 2019

Venegas, Camilo | Ruiz Suárez, Erika Johana

La presencia de materia en el agua lleva consigo a la aparición de una gran variedad de microorganismos que pueden generar un riesgo sanitario para el ser humano. Actualmente la evaluación de la calidad microbiológica se realiza mediante la determinación y detección de microorganismos indicadores, sin embargo, para mejorar la evaluación de calidad microbiológica del agua es necesario la utilización de mejores indicadores como la diferenciación de la fuente de contaminación permitiendo mejorar el control y la gestión de la calidad del agua. Para esto, se han desarrollado un sin número de metodologías entre los cuales se encuentra: métodos microbiológicos; los cuales han permitido hacer una detección y diferenciación del origen de la contaminación en el agua. Sin embargo, es necesaria la utilización en conjunto de métodos que permitan con mayor seguridad en la diferenciación de la contaminación en aguas. Es necesario que Colombia inicie la inclusión de estos indicadores con el fin de mejorar la gestión y control de calidad del agua los cuales a futuro permitirá la recuperación de estos ríos.

Show more [+]

The presence of matter in the water carries with it the appearance of a variety of microorganisms that can cause a health risk to humans. Currently, the evaluation of microbiological quality is performed by the determination and detection of microorganisms indicators, sin embargo, to mprove the evaluation of microbiological quality of water is needed the use of better indicators such as differentiation of the pollution source allowing Improve control of the management and water quality. This to have been developed number of methodologies among which is: Microbiological methods; Making which have allowed detection and differentiation of the origin of water pollution. However, it is necessary to use in conjunction with methods that allow the differentiation Security mayor of Pollution in water. Colombia is necessary start the inclusion of these indicators in order to improve the management and control of water quality which will allow the future recovery of these rivers.

Show more [+]

AGROVOC Keywords

indicadores tratamiento de aguas residuales wastewater

Bibliographic information

Publisher

Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Facultad de Ingeniería, Especialización en Planeación Ambiental y Manejo Integral de los Recursos Naturales

Other Subjects

Indictors; Agua residual; Contaminacion del agua

Language

Spanish; Castilian

Format

pdf, application/pdf

License

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Type

Info:eu-Repo/semantics/bachelorthesis; Trabajo De Grado

Source

WHO. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 update. World Heal Organ [Internet]. 2008;2010:146., Brick T, Primrose B, Chandrasekhar R, Roy S, Muliyil J, Kang G. Water contamination in urban south India: Household storage practices and their implications for water safety and enteric infections. Int J Hyg Environ Health [Internet]. 2004;207(5):473–80., Borrego JJ, Córnax R, Moriñigo MA, Martínez-Manzanares E, Romero P. Coliphages as an indicator of faecal pollution in water. their survival and productive infectivity in natural aquatic environments. Water Res [Internet]. 1990;24(1):111–6., (OMS) OM de la S. Riesgos del Ambient Hum para la salud. 1976;329, Yates M V. Classical indicators in the 21st century - Far and beyond the coliform. Water Environ Res [Internet]. 2007;79(3):279–86. Available from:, Edition F. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. World Health [Internet]. 2011;1(3):104–8., Pillai SD. Bacteriophages as indicators [Internet]. Food Virology. p. 205–22., Scott TM, Rose JB, Jenkins TM, Farrah SR, Lukasik J. Microbial source tracking: Current methodology and future directions. Appl Environ Microbiol [Internet]. 2002;68(12):5796–803., (OMS) OM de la S. No Title. Criterios Relativos a la Salud y otra Inf Base, Guías para la Calid del Agua Potable. 1987;2:93–9., Tallon P, Magajna B, Lofranco C, Kam TL. Microbial indicators of faecal contamination in water: A current perspective. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2005. p. 139–66., Caldwell J, Payment P, Villemur R. Mitochondrial DNA as Source Tracking Markers of Fecal Contamination. In: Hagedorn C, Blanch AR, Harwood VJ, editors. Microbial Source Tracking: Methods, Applications, and Case Studies. Springer New York; 2011. p. 229–50., Decreto 1594 de1984. decreto 1594 de 1984. Colombia; 1984., Blanch AR, Belanche-Muñoz L, Bonjoch X, Ebdon J, Gantzer C, Lucena F, et al. Tracking the origin of faecal pollution in surface water: an ongoing project within the European Union research programme. J Water Health [Internet]. 2004;2(4):249–60., Roslev P, Bukh AS. State of the art molecular markers for fecal pollution source tracking in water. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol [Internet]. 2011;89(5):1341–55, Meays CL, Broersma K, Nordin R, Mazumder A. Source tracking fecal bacteria in water: a critical review of current methods. J Environ Manage [Internet]. 2004;73(1):71–9., Unit W. Using Microbial Source Tracking to Support TMDL Development and Implementation. 2011;74., US Environmental Protection Agency. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2004b. Wastewater technology fact sheet: bacterial source tracking. US Environ Prot Agency [Internet]., US Environmental Protection Agency. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2004b. Wastewater technology fact sheet: bacterial source tracking. US Environ Prot Agency [Internet]., Payan A, Ebdon J, Taylor H, Gantzer C, Ottoson J, Papageorgiou GT, et al. Method for isolation of Bacteroides bacteriophage host strains suitable for tracking sources of fecal pollution in water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(9):5659–62, Stewart JR, Ellender RD, Gooch JA, Jiang S, Myoda SP, Weisberg SB. Recommendations for microbial source tracking: lessons from a methods comparison study. J Water Heal. 2003;1(4):225–31., Bernhard AE, Field KG. Identification of nonpoint sources of fecal pollution in coastal waters by using host-specific 16S ribosomal DNA genetic markers from fecal anaerobes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(4):1587–94., Lamendella R, Domingo JWS, Oerther DB, Vogel JR, Stoeckel DM. Assessment of fecal pollution sources in a small northern-plains watershed using PCR and phylogenetic analyses of Bacteroidetes 16S rRNA gene. FEMS Microbiol Ecol., Dorai-Raj S, Grady JO, Colleran E. Specificity and sensitivity evaluation of novel and existing Bacteroidales and Bifidobacteria-specific PCR assays on feces and sewage samples and their application for microbial source tracking in Ireland. Cross-validation Detect methods Pathog fecal Indic [Internet]. 2009;43(19):4980–8.

In AGRIS since: 2024-07-22

Format: Dublin Core

Data Provider

This bibliographic record has been provided by Universidad Militar Nueva Granada

Discover this data provider's collection in AGRIS

Links

http://hdl.handle.net/10654/7609

Lookup at Google Scholar

If you notice any incorrect information relating to this record, please contact us at agris@fao.org