Development and evaluation of robust molecular markers linked to disease resistance in tomato for distinctness, uniformity and stability testing
2010
Arens, Paul | Mansilla, Carmen | Deinum, Daniël | Cavellini, Laetitia | Moretti, André | Rolland, Sophie | van Der Schoot, Hanneke | Calvache, David | Ponz, Fernando | Collonnier, Cecile, C. | Mathis, Rene | Smilde, Diederick | Caranta, Carole | Vosman, Ben | Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR) | Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria = National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA) | Groupe d'études et de contrôle des variétés et des semences ; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) | Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes (GAFL) ; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) | 1314 Gip Geves Direction - Siège ; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Gip Geves Direction - Siège (Gip Geves Direction - Siège)-Accueil GEVES (Accueil GEVES)-Groupe d'étude et de controle des variétés et des semences (GEVES)
International audience
Show more [+] Less [-]English. Abstract Molecular markers linked to phenotypically important traits are of great interest especially when traits are diYcult and/or costly to be observed. In tomato where a strong focus on resistance breeding has led to the introgression of several resistance genes, resistance traits have become important characteristics in distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) testing for Plant Breeders Rights (PBR) applications. Evaluation of disease traits in biological assays is not always straightforward because assays are often inXuenced by environmental factors, and diYculties in scoring exist. In this study, we describe the development and/or evaluation of molecular marker assays for the Verticillium genes Ve1 and Ve2, the tomato mosaic virus Tm1 (linked marker), the tomato mosaic virus Tm2 and Tm22 genes, the Meloidogyne incognita Mi1-2 gene, the Fusarium I (linked marker) and I2 loci, which are obligatory traits in PBR testing. The marker assays were evaluated for their robustness in a ring test and then evaluated in a set of varieties. Although in general, results between biological assays and marker assays gave highly correlated results, marker assays showed an advantage over biological tests in that the results were clearer, i.e., homozygote/heterozygote presence of the resistance gene can be detected and heterogeneity in seed lots can be identiWed readily. Within the UPOV framework for granting of PBR, the markers have the potential to fulWl the requirements needed for implementation in DUS testing of candidate varieties and could complement or may be an alternative to the pathogenesis tests that are carried out at present.
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
This bibliographic record has been provided by Institut national de la recherche agronomique