Biomass Ash as a Substitute for Lime and Its Impact on Grassland Soil, Forage, and Soil Microbiota
2024
Felix R. Kurzemann | Marina Fernández-Delgado Juárez | Maraike Probst | María Gómez-Brandón | Heide Spiegel | Reinhard Resch | Heribert Insam | Erich M. Pötsch
In this eight-year grassland field trial, we compared the fertilization effects of biomass ashes (BMAs) and carbonated lime (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) in combined application with cattle slurry (CS). Our study focused on plant coverage, forage yield, and quality, as well as soil physicochemical and microbiological properties. The fertilization strategies included CS mixed with BMA or CaCO<sub>3</sub> applied three times a year and a separate annual application of ash or CaCO<sub>3</sub>, independent of CS. Samplings were performed in 2010, 2014, and 2018. Despite an absence of observable effects on soil, microbial properties, and forage quality, CS application, with or without BMA/CaCO<sub>3</sub>, resulted in higher forage yields compared to the unfertilized control and plots receiving only ash or CaCO<sub>3</sub>. Forage properties remained consistent across treatments. However, the combined application of CS with both ash and CaCO<sub>3</sub> led to a reduction in volatile organic compounds, total carbon, total nitrogen, nitrate, and electrical conductivity in the soil from 2010 to 2018. Additionally, the relative abundance of specific microbial families (Nitrosomonadaceae, Acidothermaceae, Bacillaceae, and Peptostreptococcaceae) varied based on whether soils received a single amendment or a combination thereof. Our findings suggest that BMA is a valuable substitute for traditional liming agents, regardless of the application mode.
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
This bibliographic record has been provided by Directory of Open Access Journals