The REACH concept and its impact on toxicological sciences
2006
Hengstler, J. G. | Foth, H. | Kahl, R. | Kramer, P. J. | Lilienblum, W. | Schulz, T. | Schweinfurth, H.
German. Currently, comprehensive toxicological data are available only for a small percentage of the 30,000 substances produced in volumes of 1-100 tons per year in the EU. Substances with inadequate safety data sets may pose a risk to employees, consumers and the environment. To improve this unsatisfactory situation the European Commission put forward a draft concept that will probably become law in 2006. The acronym of this concept is REACH standing for Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals. The aim of REACH is to systematically evaluate the risk of approximately 30,000 chemical substances produced, used or imported in quantities of 1-100 tons per year. From a practical point of view the testing requirements for these chemicals are one of the most important parts of the REACH proposal. The latter progressively increase with the volume of chemical substances, including, e.g. acute, subchronic and chronic toxicity tests. Without doubt REACH will provide an important contribution to health protection for workers and consumers. But perhaps even more importantly, REACH offers an opportunity to optimize and innovate testing strategies for chemicals. Such novel techniques are in particular RNA expression profiling, proteome analysis and metabonomics to describe alterations in gene or protein expressions patterns or in metabolite concentrations in response to toxic stimuli. Promising data have been published indicating that these techniques might identify hepato- or nephrotoxic compounds or even carcinogens differentiating between genotoxic and non-genotoxic substances. However, so far only a relatively small number of selected typical substances with well known toxic mechanisms has been tested. Therefore, the most promising innovative techniques should be optimized and validated by investigating a series of other typical but also untypical substances. In a further step a supplementary research program to REACH should be launched including promising innovative techniques (e.g. genomics, proteomics, metabonomics) but also other alternative methods (e.g. in vitro or QSAR), concentrating on the same substances that have to be tested by conventional animal studies in the mandatory part of REACH. In the present review we summarize key features of REACH, and discuss possibilities for the development of improved techniques and integrated strategies for toxicity testing
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
Publisher Elsevier
ISSN 0300-483XThis bibliographic record has been provided by German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment