AGRIS - International System for Agricultural Science and Technology

Human brain posseses the ability to create a concept to assist the process of grouping individual object or events into different classes or categories. We call this grouping process as categorization. In addition to humans, the ability to categorize has also been proposed for animals. Being able to identify, visually or otherwise, a new object as a member of a category is an advantage for animals. Present experiment aims to test the categorization ability in discriminating species by Macaca fascicularis. Using match-to-sample task with photographs of monkeys and human as stimuli, we tested whether monkeys able to categorize monkey individuals as a class against human individuals as another class. We found that monkeys categorized humans differently from monkeys. The monkeys used physical characteristic such as shape and colors from the photographs to create different concepts of human and monkeys.

2012

WIDAYATI, KANTHI ARUM | SURYOBROTO, BAMBANG | FARAJALLAH, ACHMAD | MIKAMI, AKICHIKA


Bibliographic information
Publisher
Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia
Other Subjects
We tested whether monkeys able to categorize monkey individuals as a class against human individuals as another class. we found that monkeys categorized humans differently from monkeys. the monkeys used physical characteristic such as shape and colors from the photographs to create different concepts of human and monkeys.; 14.15pt; Visually or otherwise; A new object as a member of a category is an advantage for animals. present experiment aims to test the categorization ability in discriminating species by macaca fascicularis. using match-to-sample task with photographs of monkeys and human as stimuli; Text-indent; 9pt; The ability to categorize has also been proposed for animals. being able to identify; Text-align; .0001pt; Line-height; Justify; ">human brain posseses the ability to create a concept to assist the process of grouping individual object or events into different classes or categories. we call this grouping process as categorization. in addition to humans; ">; Normal
Language
English
Format
application/pdf
ISSN
2086-4094, 1978-3019
Type
Info:eu-Repo/semantics/article; Info:eu-Repo/semantics/publishedversion; Peer-Reviewed Article
Source
HAYATI Journal of Biosciences; Vol. 18 No. 4 (2011): December 2011; 177, 2086-4094, 1978-3019

2025-06-17
Dublin Core
Data Provider

This bibliographic record has been provided by IPB University

Discover this data provider's collection in AGRIS

Links
DOI https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/hayati/article/view/%20%3Cp%20class%3D%22MsoNormal%22%20style%3D%22margin-bottom%3A.0001pt%3Btext-align%3Ajustify%3Btext-indent%3A14.15pt%3Bline-height%3Anormal%3B%22%3E%3Cstrong%3E%3Cspan%20style%3D%22font-size%3A9pt%3B%22%3EHuman%20brain%20posseses%20the%20ability%20to%20create%20a%20concept%20to%20assist%20the%20process%20of%20grouping%20individual%20object%20or%20events%20into%20different%20classes%20or%20categories.%20We%20call%20this%20grouping%20process%20as%20categorization.%20In%20addition%20to%20humans%2C%20the%20ability%20to%20categorize%20has%20also%20been%20proposed%20for%20animals.%20Being%20able%20to%20identify%2C%20visually%20or%20otherwise%2C%20a%20new%20object%20as%20a%20member%20of%20a%20category%20is%20an%20advantage%20for%20animals.%20Present%20experiment%20aims%20to%20test%20the%20categorization%20ability%20in%20discriminating%20species%20by%20%3Cem%3EMacaca%20fascicularis%3C%2Fem%3E.%20Using%20match-to-sample%20task%20with%20photographs%20of%20monkeys%20and%20human%20as%20stimuli%2C%20we%20tested%20whether%20monkeys%20able%20to%20categorize%20monkey%20individuals%20as%20a%20class%20against%20human%20individuals%20as%20another%20class.%20We%20found%20that%20monkeys%20categorized%20humans%20differently%20from%20monkeys.%20The%20monkeys%20used%20physical%20characteristic%20such%20as%20shape%20and%20colors%20from%20the%20photographs%20to%20create%20different%20concepts%20of%20human%20and%20monkeys.%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2Fstrong%3E%3C%2Fp%3E https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/hayati/article/view/%20%3Cp%20class%3D%22MsoNormal%22%20style%3D%22margin-bottom%3A.0001pt%3Btext-align%3Ajustify%3Btext-indent%3A14.15pt%3Bline-height%3Anormal%3B%22%3E%3Cstrong%3E%3Cspan%20style%3D%22font-size%3A9pt%3B%22%3EHuman%20brain%20posseses%20the%20ability%20to%20create%20a%20concept%20to%20assist%20the%20process%20of%20grouping%20individual%20object%20or%20events%20into%20different%20classes%20or%20categories.%20We%20call%20this%20grouping%20process%20as%20categorization.%20In%20addition%20to%20humans%2C%20the%20ability%20to%20categorize%20has%20also%20been%20proposed%20for%20animals.%20Being%20able%20to%20identify%2C%20visually%20or%20otherwise%2C%20a%20new%20object%20as%20a%20member%20of%20a%20category%20is%20an%20advantage%20for%20animals.%20Present%20experiment%20aims%20to%20test%20the%20categorization%20ability%20in%20discriminating%20species%20by%20%3Cem%3EMacaca%20fascicularis%3C%2Fem%3E.%20Using%20match-to-sample%20task%20with%20photographs%20of%20monkeys%20and%20human%20as%20stimuli%2C%20we%20tested%20whether%20monkeys%20able%20to%20categorize%20monkey%20individuals%20as%20a%20class%20against%20human%20individuals%20as%20another%20class.%20We%20found%20that%20monkeys%20categorized%20humans%20differently%20from%20monkeys.%20The%20monkeys%20used%20physical%20characteristic%20such%20as%20shape%20and%20colors%20from%20the%20photographs%20to%20create%20different%20concepts%20of%20human%20and%20monkeys.%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2Fstrong%3E%3C%2Fp%3E/2680
Lookup at Google Scholar
If you notice any incorrect information relating to this record, please contact us at [email protected]