Can Growth Increase of Small Trees after Drought Compensate for Large Trees’ Growth Loss?

Large trees dominate stand-level biomass but their growth suffers more from droughts, while sheltering small trees during droughts. Under a warmer and drier climate, whether the growth decline of large trees could be compensated by prompted small trees&rsquo: growth remains unknown. Based on the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) series, drought characteristics were determined, and two drought events were selected. We reconstructed historical diameters at breast height (DBH) and the aboveground biomass of Larix gmelinii through tree ring data allometric equations. To clarify the difference in the responses of tree size to drought, we calculated resistance, recovery, and resilience in each diameter class. We used a growth dominance coefficient (GDC) to exhibit the contributions of different-sized individuals to stand growth and demonstrated the growth dynamics of both the individual and stand level. The results proved that large trees were more vulnerable to local droughts, the resilience of larch had a negative relationship with the DBH (p &lt: 0.05), and small trees could recover to even exceed their pre-drought growth level. Most plots had a negative GDC and small trees contributed more to stand growth compared with their size, but their AGB growth was far less than that of large trees, which made it difficult to compensate for stand growth decline. Our results indicate that tree resilience has a negative relationship with their pre-drought sizes, as large trees in the stand fail to regain their growth level before drought. Even with a larger relative contribution and higher resilience, small trees cannot cover deficits in large trees&rsquo: growth. Under more frequent droughts, the total aboveground biomass growth of larches would decline.