Network of networks: Time series clustering of ameriflux sites
2025
Reed, David E. | Chu, Housen | Peter, Brad G. | Chen, Jiquan | Abraha, Michael | Amiro, Brian | Anderson, Ray G. | Arain, M. Altaf | Arruda, Paulo | Barron-Gafford, Greg A. | Bernacchi, Carl | Beverly, Daniel P. | Biraud, Sebastien C. | Black, T. Andrew | Blanken, Peter D. | Bohrer, Gil | Bowler, Rebecca | Bowling, David R. | Forsythe, Brandon R. | Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela | Zona, Donatella
Environmental observation networks, such as AmeriFlux, are foundational for monitoring ecosystem response to climate change, management practices, and natural disturbances; however, their effectiveness depends on their representativeness for the regions or continents. We proposed an empirical, time series approach to quantify the similarity of ecosystem fluxes across AmeriFlux sites. We extracted the diel and seasonal characteristics (i.e., amplitudes, phases) from carbon dioxide, water vapor, energy, and momentum fluxes, which reflect the effects of climate, plant phenology, and ecophysiology on the observations, and explored the potential aggregations of AmeriFlux sites through hierarchical clustering. While net radiation and temperature showed latitudinal clus tering as expected, flux variables revealed a more uneven clustering with many small (number of sites < 5), unique groups and a few large (> 100) to intermediate (15–70) groups, highlighting the significant ecological regulations of ecosystem fluxes. Many identified unique groups were from under-sampled ecoregions and biome types of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP), with distinct flux dynamics compared to the rest of the network. At the finer spatial scale, local topography, disturbance, management, edaphic, and hy drological regimes further enlarge the difference in flux dynamics within the groups. Nonetheless, our clustering approach is a data-driven method to interpret the AmeriFlux network, informing future cross-site syntheses, upscaling, and model-data benchmarking research. Finally, we highlighted the unique and underrepresented sites in the AmeriFlux network, which were found mainly in Hawaii and Latin America, mountains, and at undersampled IGBP types (e.g., urban, open water), motivating the incorporation of new/unregistered sites from these groups.
Show more [+] Less [-]Instituto de Clima y Agua
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Reed, David E. Yale University. Yale School of the Environment; Estados Unidos. University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma. Division of Science & Physical Education; Estados Unidos. Michigan State University. Department of Geography, Environment & Spatial Sciences; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Chun, Housen. Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Peter, Brad G. University of Arkansas. Department of Geosciences; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Chen, Jiquan. Michigan State University. Department of Geography, Environment & Spatial Sciences; Estados Unidos. Michigan State University. Center for Global Change and Earth Observations; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Abraha, Michael. Michigan State University. Center for Global Change and Earth Observations; Estados Unidos.
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Amiro, Brian. University of Manitoba. Department of Soil Science; Canadá
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Anderson, Ray G.USDA-Agricultural Research Service. US Salinity Laboratory. Agricultural Water Efficiency and Salinity Research Unit; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Arain, M. Altaf. McMaster University. School of Earth, Environment and Society; Canadá
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Arruda, Paulo. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso. Programa de Pos-Graduaçao em Física Ambiental; Brasil
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Barron - Gafford, Greg A. University of Arizona. School of Geography, Development, & Environment; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Bernacchi, Carl. USDA Agricultural Research Service. Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Beverly, Daniel P. University of Indiana. Paul O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Biraud, Sebastien C. Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Black, T. Andrew. University of British Columbia. Faculty of Land and Food Systems; Canadá
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Blanken, Peter D. Univesity of Colorado. Department of Geography; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Bohrer, Gil. The Ohio State University. Department of Civil, Environmental & Geodetic Engineering; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Bowler, Rebecca. British Columbia Ministry of Forests; Canadá
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Bowling, David R. The University of Utah. School of Biological Sciences; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Forsythe, Brandon R. Yale University. Yale School of the Environment; Estados Unidos. University of Arkansas. Department of Geosciences; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Posse Beaulieu, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Show more [+] Less [-]Fil: Zona, Donatella. San Diego State University. Department of Biology; Estados Unidos
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
This bibliographic record has been provided by Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria