Processing Tomato Crop Benefits from Flowering Plants in Field Margins That Support Pollinators and Natural Enemies
2025
Vaya Kati | Theodoros Stathakis | Leonidas Economou | Philippos Mylonas | Myrto Barda | Theodoros Angelioudakis | Athanasia Bratidou Parlapani | Ilias Tsamis | Filitsa Karamaouna
In a two-year experiment, we examined whether increasing plant diversity in the margins of processing tomato fields could attract pollinators and natural enemies of pests compared to weed flora, and questioned the effect on crop yield. Two plant mixtures sown in winter (WM) and spring (SM) were compared with weed vegetation along a tomato crop (CT) and an adjacent irrigation channel (CC). Flower cover was higher in the sown mixtures than the weedy margins, and brought in more visits of pollinating bees (including potential tomato pollinators) than the latter. Flowering species were mainly <i>Eruca vesicaria</i> (WM, SM), <i>Coriandrum sativum</i> and <i>Lathyrus sativus</i> (WM), <i>Fagopyron esculentum</i> and <i>Phacelia tanacetifolia</i> (SM), and <i>Ammi majus</i>, <i>Rapistrum rugosum</i> (CC, CT). Parasitoids (Eulophidae, Braconidae, Scelionidae) were more abundant in the sown and CC margins compared to the CT margin, while the abundance of predators (Aeolothripidae, <i>Orius</i> sp., Thomisidae) was similar among all types of margins. Fruit weight was higher in the field with the sown margins, while pest incidence in the crop was not affected by the margin type. Our findings provide new insights into the contribution of managed and existing field margins in attracting beneficial arthropods, and their implications on yield.
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
This bibliographic record has been provided by Directory of Open Access Journals