Conversion of degraded forests to oil palm plantations in the Peruvian Amazonia: Shifts in soil and ecosystem-level greenhouse gas fluxes
2025
Hergoualc'H, Kristell Anaïk | López Gonzales, Mariela | Málaga, Natalia | Martius, Christopher | Ecologie fonctionnelle et biogéochimie des sols et des agro-écosystèmes (UMR Eco&Sols) ; Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut Agro Montpellier ; Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro) | Centre de recherche forestière internationale (CIFOR) | Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR) | International Climate Initiative;IKI;DEU; | Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation;Norad;NOR; | Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers;CGIAR;FRA;http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100015815
Source Agritrop Cirad (https://agritrop.cirad.fr/612577/) * Autres projets (id;sigle;titre): ;;(DEU) Transparent monitoring in practice: supporting post-Paris land use sector mitigation//
Show more [+] Less [-]International audience
Show more [+] Less [-]English. Oil palm (OP) expansion and associated forest clearance can significantly impact greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes. We investigated carbon stocks and soil GHG (N2O, CO2, CH4) fluxes in a degraded forest and an adjacent 17-year-old OP plantation in Peruvian Amazonia. The plantation comprised three nitrogen (N) fertilizer treatments: 0 (OPN0), 84 (OPN1), 168 (OPN2) kg N ha−1 y−1. Carbon stocks were inventoried across all pools. GHG and environmental parameters were monitored monthly for 11 months and (bi)daily when fertilizing the OP, with measurements taken both near and far from trees/palms. Ecosystem-scale CO2equivalent losses from the conversion were computed by balancing carbon stock losses against N2O emission changes. N2O emissions (kg N ha−1 y−1) in the forest (6.7 ± 1.2) where litterfall N inputs were large (213 kg N ha−1 y−1) were 11, 5, and 3 times the emissions in OPN0 (0.6 ± 0.2), OPN1 (1.4 ± 0.2), and OPN2 (2.3 ± 0.3). In the plantation, 1 % of the N fertilizer applied was released as N2O. Across ecosystems, N inputs primarily controlled N2O emissions. Soil respiration (Mg C ha−1 y−1) was 1.4 times higher in the forest (9.1 ± 0.6) than in the plantation (7.3 ± 1, 5.5 ± 0.5, 6.5 ± 0.3 in OPN0, OPN1, OPN2). The forest was a soil CH4 (kg C ha−1 y−1) sink (-1.5 ± 0.3) while all OP treatments were sources (0.2 ± 0.3, 0.7 ± 0.5, 0.2 ± 0.4 in OPN0, OPN1, OPN2). Ecosystem carbon stock losses from forest-to-OP conversion were substantial (196.8 ± 44.0 Mg CO2 ha−1 15 y−1) and partially offset (14–20 %) by decreased N2O emissions. Complementary studies for this transition are needed to improve global GHG assessments.
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
This bibliographic record has been provided by Institut national de la recherche agronomique