Processes and principles for producing credible climate change attribution messages: lessons from Australia and New Zealand
2024
Michael Grose | Pandora Hope | James Risbey | Camille J Mora | Sarah Perkins-Kirkpatrick | Andrew King | Luke J Harrington | Suzanne Rosier | Richard Matear | Mitchell Black | Dáithi Stone | David Frame | Roseanna C McKay | Hamish Ramsay | Linjing Zhou | Gen Tolhurst
Extreme event attribution (EEA) information is increasingly in demand from climate services. EEA messages can: raise awareness about the effect climate change has already imposed, inform climate change liability conversations, and be combined with climate projections to inform adaptation. However, due to limitations in observations, models and methods, there are barriers towards operationalising EEA in practice. Operational services will need EEA to be done transparently and using preset formats. Here we review recent experience and practice in EEA in Australia and New Zealand with a view to inform the design of an EEA component of climate services. We present a flow chart of the processes involved, noting particular care is needed on the trigger, event definition, and climate model evaluation, with effective stage gates. We also promote the use of tailored causal network diagrams as a standard tool to inform an EEA study and communicate results, with particular care needed for messages on events with lower confidence or complex sets of influences, including tropical cyclones and extratropical cyclones. We suggest that extending EEA to impact attribution is essential for making EEA messages salient but requires an uplift in forming interdisciplinary teams and in granular exposure and vulnerability datasets and is likely to raise new interdisciplinary methodological questions. Finally, we suggest communication of EEA messages can learn more from its origins in medical epidemiology.
Show more [+] Less [-]AGROVOC Keywords
Bibliographic information
This bibliographic record has been provided by Directory of Open Access Journals