Acid mine drainage (AMD), a legacy of coal and mineral extraction, contaminates streams with complex mixtures of acid and heavy metals that are usually partitioned between the water column and substrate. Understanding the conditions under which sediments retain toxicity after the water column is cleared is important for predicting the long term success of remediation efforts. We conducted laboratory and field experiments to evaluate the relative contribution of acidity versus metals to the toxicity of AMD contaminated sediment towards aquatic macroinvertebrates. Laboratory bioassays showed that precipitate-coated substrate from AMD-impacted sites were toxic to Ctenodaphnia magna and reduced growth of mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae). Toxicity correlated more with acidity released from the sediment than with metals. After transplantation to a clean stream, the same Al- and Fe-contaminated substrate were not toxic to daphnia and was readily colonized by benthic macroinvertebrates within 5 weeks.

This paper reports a laboratory-scale investigation concerning the use of sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) in a semi-continuous process, where column packed-bed type bioreactors were used for the treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD). The use of different materials as solid matrices was tested and the performance of the bioremediation processes was discussed in terms of sulphate and metals removal and acid neutralization. The behaviour of a reactor filled with acidic soil from a mining area and organic wastes was compared with other three reactors where coarse sand, glass spheres and cereal straw were used as packaging materials. Batch experiments showed the presence and growth of SRB from the acidic soil in different pH conditions and the effect of the absence or presence of several added carbon sources: lactate, ethanol and lactose. The data showed that it is possible to grow SRB using the acidic soil as source of inocula, in the absence and in the presence of the carbon sources tested, since the pH of the media was previously increased to values of 5 or higher. When acidic soil from the mining area and organic wastes were utilised as column matrices, it is possible to remove the metals and to neutralise the acidity of AMD, although an inefficient sulphate removal was observed. When coarse sand or glass spheres were utilised, efficient metals sulphate removal were achieved. However, the incapacity of both systems to generate enough alkalinity does not allow maintaining their good performances in terms of iron removal and sulphate reduction. As a result, the incorporation of materials with neutralizing and buffer capacity to the matrix is recommended. Due to its low density, cereal straw was not suitable to obtain an anaerobic environment inside the column for SRB activity.

This work describes recent research carried out in an extremely acidic (pH 0.61–0.82) and hypersaline (e.g., 134 g/L SO₄ ²⁻, 74 g/L Fe, 7.5 g/L Al, 3 g/L Mg, 2 g/L Cu, 1 g/L Zn) leachate which seeps from a pyrite pile in San Telmo mine (Huelva, SW Spain) and forms evaporative pools of ultra-concentrated water in which attractive crystals of Zn-rich melanterite (FeᴵᴵSO₄ 7H₂O) are formed. Geochemical modeling with the Pitzer method indicates that the acidic brine was near saturation with respect to melanterite (SIMₑₗ = 0 ± 0.2). The microbiological investigation has revealed a surprisingly high biomass (1.4 × 10⁶ cells mL⁻¹) and an exotic ecosystem composed of acidophilic, Fe-oxidizing archaea (mainly Ferroplasma spp., representing 52% of the microbial population), and minor numbers of acidophilic bacteria (including Leptospirillum spp. (3.2%), Acidithiobacillus spp. (1.6%), and Alphaproteobacteria (2.8%)). The microbial production of Feᴵᴵᴵ allows the oxidative dissolution of pyrite and other sulphides, which results in additional inputs of Feᴵᴵ, SO₄ ²⁻ and acidity to the system. The surfaces of the pyrite crystals show a typical etch-pitted texture, as well as blobs of elemental sulphur, which are both compatible with this indirect, microbially mediated oxidation mechanism. The composition of the acidic leachate seems to result from the combination of several processes which include: (1) formation of melanterite within the pile during relatively dry seasons, (2) subsequent dissolution of melanterite during rainy episodes, (3) microbial oxidation of Feᴵᴵ, (4) sulphide oxidation mediated by Feᴵᴵᴵ, (5) dissolution of chlorite and other aluminosilicates present in the pile, and (6) cooling and/or evaporation of seepage from the pile and consequent melanterite precipitation.

This paper deals with field measurements and hydraulic, oxygen transport and geochemical speciation modeling undertaken to evaluate the performance of a sand-bentonite test cover overlying a 20% sloping waste rock platform. A pit run (gravelly sand) layer protected the sand-bentonite layer. The study site was the Whistle Mine near Capreol, Ontario, Canada. The purpose of the study was to evaluate a number of test covers and select a final cover for the decommissioning of 7 million tonnes of acid-generating waste rock at the site. The sand-bentonite test plot and a control plot consisting of waste rock without cover were monitored over 3 years for water content, suction, soil temperature, gaseous oxygen concentrations, and water percolation. Air temperature, rainfall, snow pack and potential evaporation were also monitored. Finite element modeling showed very good agreement between modeled and measured cumulative precipitation, daily potential evaporation and cumulative evaporation, and to a lesser extent, the cumulative water percolation through the test cover. Due to construction difficulties in the field, the back of the waste rock platform was not covered with the test cover. This resulted in oxygen ingress from the back side of the waste rock. Oxygen transport modeling showed that if the entire waste rock pile had been covered, the daily oxygen flux would have been reduced by 90% to only 0.003 g/m²/day. Such low oxygen flux would minimize sulphide oxidation and hence acid generation in the waste rock. Aqueous equilibrium speciation modeling suggested that the concentrations of sulphate [graphic removed] , iron (Fe), and aluminum (Al) in percolate water in contact with waste rock were controlled by secondary minerals such as gypsum, alunite, and ferrihydrite.

A biological source treatment (BST) technique using remote sensing and biogeochemistry has been developed to address acid mine drainage (AMD) at its source. The BST technique utilizes down-hole injections of microbial inoculum and substrate amendments to establish a biofilm on the surface of metal sulfides (AMD source material). The treatment results in an elevated groundwater pH (from acidic to circum-neutral levels) and prevents further oxidation of AMD source material. The first 2 years of an ongoing field study of the BST technique at a reclaimed coal mine in central Tennessee (USA) has produced successful results. For instance, the water chemistry in a monitoring well down-gradient from injection wells has improved substantially as follows: the pH increased 1.3 units from 5.7 to 7.3, the dissolved (0.45 μm-filtered) iron concentration decreased by 84% from 93 to 15 mg/l, the conductivity decreased by 379 μS/cm, and sulfate decreased by 78 mg/l. Electromagnetic induction surveys were conducted to identify AMD source material and monitor BST performance by measuring changes in subsurface resistivity throughout the site. These surveys revealed a treatment zone created between injection wells where the resistance of contaminated groundwater from up-gradient AMD sources increased as it flowed past injection wells, thus, suggesting this technique could be used to treat AMD sources directly or to intercept and neutralize sub-surface AMD.