The effects of soil processes, related to the oxidation of sulphide sediments, on heavy metal concentrations in the soil and soil solution were investigated in a Norway spruce stand on a fine-textured, acidic soil rich in sulphates located on the isostatic land-uplift western coast of Finland. The age of the soil is ca. 300–400 years, and the soil texture is silt and till. The chemical properties of the soil and soil solution clearly reflected the formation of acid sulphate (AS) soil. Compared to background reference values for podzolic coniferous forest soil, the pH of the soil solution in the mineral soil (20–40 cm depth) was very low, and the Al, Fe and S concentrations extremely high. The Zn and Ni concentrations in the soil solution were also strongly elevated, and similar to the concentrations reported close to anthropogenic heavy-metal emission sources. The concentrations of Cd and Cu were also frequently elevated. In contrast, the acidity and metal concentrations of the soil solution sampled in the organic layer were not elevated. Similarly, exchangeable Zn and Ni concentrations were also elevated in the mineral soil, but not in the organic layer. Because Norway spruce has a very superficial rooting system and the zone with exceptionally high metal concentrations did not extend up to the topmost soil layers, sulphide-oxidation derived soil acidification is not likely to pose a serious threat to forest ecosystems growing on this type of site. Despite the elevated concentrations of protons and many metals in the mineral soil and soil solution (20–40 cm), the nutrient status of the spruce stand was satisfactory and the general health of the stand has been reported to be relatively good.

Due to the episodic nature of rainfall and the high dissolved metal concentrations in the acid sulfate soil catchment of Clothiers Creek (NSW, Australia), active treatment was considered more appropriate than passive treatment. Alkaline reagents were added to oxidised shallow drains to remove acidities ranging from 438 to 1,837 mg/L CaCO₃. A fine limestone slurry was produced from the pounding together of limestone rock fragments within a rotating drum and, on addition to drain waters, was found to remove acidity to varying degrees of effectiveness (from 12 to 100%). The efficiency decreased as the pH of the water approached neutrality due to calcite saturation and the slow reaction rate of limestone at high pH. Hydrated lime powder was also mixed with drain water in the rotating drum though most mixing occurred once the slurry entered the drain where efficiencies ranging from 67 to 89% were observed. A powdered mixture of MgCO₃ and CaCO₃ was only 11% effective in treatment of the drainage water due to the slow rate of reaction of MgCO₃. Whilst the active treatment system was capable of treating a large acidity flux (particularly using hydrated lime) it required regular addition of reagent and the dosing of hydrated lime was particularly difficult to control. Future designs of this active treatment system should be automated to prevent adverse aquatic impacts due to overdosing.

On the coastal plains of Finland there are approximately 3,000 km² of acid sulfate soils developed as a result of intensive agricultural drainage of waterlogged sulfide-bearing sediments. The runoff from these soils contains very high amounts of acidity and metals that have severely deteriorated the aquaculture in several downstream rivers and estuaries. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop and test more environmental friendly ways of draining landscapes underlain with these nasty soils. In this study, over a 3-year monitoring period the effect of excess surface liming, controlled drainage and lime filter drainage of acid sulfate soils on runoff water quality (pH, sulfate, metals) was determined and assessed. The results showed that (1) the liming measures had not prevented severely acidic and metal-rich waters from forming and discharging from the soils, (2) the controlled drainage system might have reduced discharge peaks but its potential effects on the discharged water quality were nondetectable due to its small effect on the groundwater level and naturally inherited heterogeneities, and (3) the spatial and temporal variations identified for the various hydrochemical determinants were not caused by the kind of treatment applied. Therefore, on acid sulfate soil fields, like the one studied here, the short-term hydrochemical effects of the treatments tested are minor (or nonexistent) at least as long as the controlled drainage systems are not technically improved or better maintained.