Report on the comparison of 3 carbon monitoring methods and on the implementation of the method (French case)
2020
Ceschia, Eric | Duparque, Annie | Boissy, Joachim | Marie, Anne | Centre d'études spatiales de la biosphère (CESBIO) ; Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3) ; Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse (Comue de Toulouse)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Agro-Transfert Ressources et Territoires | NATAÏS | Union Européenne | European Project: 200328
This report corresponds to the 2020 Output n° 5: “Improved method for soil carbon monitoring (French case)”. It concerns the Work Package 2 “Developing and implementing an action plan with demand owner 2, Nataïs, Gers, France” and to the Task 2.2. in which deployment of SAFYE-CO2 soil carbon method was continued and a comparison initiated with other carbon monitoring methods. The report will present the results obtained on one farm from the Nataïs network. First, we present the study area along with the primary objective of the task. Second, we describe the carbon monitoring methods as well as their differences and similarities. Third, we present the results for each carbon monitoring method outputs. Finally, we will discuss these results with respect to their differences and similarities.
Mostrar más [+] Menos [-]Palabras clave de AGROVOC
Información bibliográfica
Este registro bibliográfico ha sido proporcionado por Institut national de la recherche agronomique