The Revival of the "Cash versus Food" Debate
2016
Gentilini, Ugo
The longstanding “cash versus food” debate has receivedrenewed attention in both research and practice. Thispaper reviews key issues shaping the debate and presentsnew evidence from randomized and quasi-experimentalevaluations that deliberately compare cash and in-kindfood transfers in ten developing counties. Findings showthat relative effectiveness cannot be generalized: althoughsome differences emerge in terms of food consumptionand dietary diversity, average impacts tend to depend oncontext, specific objectives, and their measurement. Costsfor cash transfers and vouchers tend to be significantlylower relative to in-kind food. Yet the consistency androbustness of methods for efficiency analyses varies greatly.
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Mots clés AGROVOC
Informations bibliographiques
Cette notice bibliographique a été fournie par World Bank
Découvrez la collection de ce fournisseur de données dans AGRIS