Reducing the risk of Atlantic thermohaline circulation collapse: sensitivity analysis of emissions corridors

We present emissions corridors for the 21st century reducing the risk of collapse of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation (THC) while considering expectations about the socio-economically acceptable pace of emissions reductions. Emissions corridors embrace the range of CO₂ emissions that are compatible with normatively defined policy goals or 'guardrails'. They are calculated along the conceptual and methodological lines of the tolerable windows approach. We investigate the sensitivity of the emissions corridors to key uncertain physical quantities (i.e. climate sensitivity and North Atlantic hydrological sensitivity, emissions of non-CO₂ greenhouse gases and sulfate aerosols) as well as to the guardrails. Results indicate a large dependency of the width of the emissions corridor on climate and hydrological sensitivity: for low values of the climate and/or hydrological sensitivity, the corridor boundaries are far from being transgressed by business-as-usual emissions scenarios for the 21st century. In contrast, for high values of both quantities already low non-intervention scenarios leave the corridor in the early decades of this century. The width of the CO₂ emissions corridor is also affected by the emissions pathway of non-CO₂ greenhouse gases and sulfate aerosols, but to a lesser extent. We further find that the choice of the policy goal strongly influences the shape of the emissions corridor. Pursuit of a more ambitious THC target, for instance, tightens the corridor considerably. More strict expectations concerning the socio-economically admissible pace of emissions reduction (expressed in terms of a maximum emissions reduction rate and a transition time towards a de-carbonizing economy) act in the same direction. This indicates that a trade-off between THC and socio-economic guardrails may be unavoidable in the case of very tight emissions corridors.