Nitrogen in vivo digestibility and in situ degradability data for estimation of lower tract N digestibility with or without correction for microbial contamination
2007
Milis, C. | Liamadis, D. | Karatzias, C. | Abas, Z.
In situ degradability and in vivo (by difference) digestibility trials were conducted to estimate lower tract residual N digestibility (LTRND) of five protein supplements. Efforts were also made to improve the in situ method of measuring protein degradability. For in situ degradability trials, soybean meal (SBM), corn gluten meal (CGM), cotton seed cake (CSC), wheat bran (WB) and corn gluten feed (CGF) were weighed into Dacron bags and incubated in the rumen of three cannulated Chios ewes. SBM, CGF and WB were degraded significantly, while CGM and CSC were least degraded. Microbial contamination (MC) resulted in a 5.3-28.3% artificially decrease in effective ruminal protein degradation of supplements. Total tract digestibility was measured using five rams in an in vivo, by difference, trial using a 5 x 5 Latin-square design. SBM had higher CP digestibility compared to WB, CGF and CSC, and higher N free extract (NFE) digestibility compared to the other feeds. CGM showed higher CP digestibility compared to WB, CGF or CSC, while CGF had higher organic matter (OM) and crude fibre (CF) digestibility compared to WB. CSC was the protein source with the lowest digestibility of OM, CP and NFE in comparison with the other feeds. LTRND was predicted as 0.928, 0.806, 0.227, 0.540, and 0.498 for SBM, CGM, CSC, WB, and CGF, respectively, or 0.931, 0.803, 0.147, 0.364, and 0.316 when the correction for MC was applied. Lower tract N digestibility could be predicted via a combination of in situ degradability and in vivo apparent digestibility data. This approach yields significant data regarding LTRND estimation of protein supplements, while diminishing animal suffering by avoiding small intestinal fistulation.
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Mots clés AGROVOC
Informations bibliographiques
Cette notice bibliographique a été fournie par National Agricultural Library
Découvrez la collection de ce fournisseur de données dans AGRIS