Complementarity between the updated version of the front-of-pack nutrition label Nutri-Score and the food-processing NOVA classification | Complémentarité entre la version actualisée de l'étiquetage nutritionnel à l'avant des emballages Nutri-Score et la classification NOVA
2024
Sarda, Barthélemy | Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle | Deschamps, Valérie | Ducrot, Pauline | Galan, Pilar | Hercberg, Serge | Deschasaux-Tanguy, Melanie | Srour, Bernard | Fezeu, Leopold | Touvier, Mathilde | Julia, Chantal | Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics | Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistiques (CRESS (U1153 / UMR_A 1125)) ; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team | Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle (EREN [CRESS - U1153 / UMR_A 1125]) ; Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [Cnam] (Cnam)-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord-Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics | Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistiques (CRESS (U1153 / UMR_A 1125)) ; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Santé publique France - French National Public Health Agency [Saint-Maurice, France]
International audience
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]anglais. Objective: To compare the initial and the updated versions of the front-pf-pack label Nutri-Score (related to the nutritional content) with the NOVA classification (related to the degree of food processing) at the food level. Design: Using the OpenFoodFacts database -129,950 food products-, we assessed the complementarity between the Nutri-Score (initial and updated) with the NOVA classification through a correspondence analysis. Contingency tables between the two classification systems were used. Settings: The food offer in France. Participants: Not applicable Results: With both versions (i.e. initial and updated) of the Nutri-Score, the majority of ultra-processed products received medium to poor Nutri-Score ratings (between 77.9% and 87.5% of ultra-processed products depending on the version of the algorithm). Overall, the update of the Nutri-Score algorithm led to a reduction in the number of products rated A and B and an increase in the number of products rated D or E for all NOVA categories, with unprocessed foods being the least impacted (-3.8 percentage points (-5.2%) rated A or B and +1.3 percentage points (+12.9%) rated D or E) and ultra-processed foods the most impacted (-9.8 percentage points (-43.4%) rated A or B and +7.8 percentage points (+14.1%) rated D or E). Among ultra-processed foods rated favourably with the initial Nutri-Score, artificially-sweetened beverages, sweetened plant-based drinks and bread products were the most penalized categories by the revision of Nutri-Score while low-sugar flavoured waters, fruit and legume preparations were the least affected. Conclusion: These results indicate that the update of the Nutri-Score reinforces its coherence with the NOVA classification, even though both systems measure two distinct health dimensions at the food level.
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Mots clés AGROVOC
Informations bibliographiques
Cette notice bibliographique a été fournie par Institut national de la recherche agronomique
Découvrez la collection de ce fournisseur de données dans AGRIS