Review: Use and misuse of meta-analysis in Animal Science
2020
Sauvant, Daniel | Letourneau-Montminy, M. | Schmidely, Philippe | Boval, Maryline | Loncke, Christelle | Daniel, J. | Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants (MoSAR) ; AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE) | Université Laval [Québec] (ULaval) | Trouw Nutrition R&D
International audience
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]anglais. In animal sciences, the number of published meta-analyses is increasing at a rate of 15% per year. This current review focuses on the good practices and the potential pitfalls in the conduct of meta-analyses in animal sciences, nutrition in particular. Once the study objectives have been defined, several key phases must be considered when doing a meta-analysis. First, as a principle of traceability, criteria used to select or discard publications should be clearly stated in a way that one could reproduce the final selection of data. Then, the coding phase, aiming to isolate specific experimental factors for an accurate graphical and statistical interpretation of the database, is discussed. Following this step, the study of the levels of independence of factors and of the degree of data balance of the meta-design represents an essential phase to ensure the validity of statistical processing. The consideration of the study effect as fixed or random must next be considered. It appears based on several examples that this choice does not generally have any influence on the conclusions of a meta-analysis when the number of experiments is sufficient.
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Mots clés AGROVOC
Informations bibliographiques
Cette notice bibliographique a été fournie par Institut national de la recherche agronomique
Découvrez la collection de ce fournisseur de données dans AGRIS