Antimicrobial resistances do not affect colonization parameters of intestinal E. coli in a small piglet group
2009
Schierack, P. | Kadlec, Kristina | Guenther, S. | Filter, M. | Schwarz, Stefan | Ewers, C. | Wieler, L.H.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Although antimicrobial resistance and persistence of resistant bacteria in humans and animals are major health concerns worldwide, the impact of antimicrobial resistance on bacterial intestinal colonization in healthy domestic animals has only been rarely studied. We carried out a retrospective analysis of the antimicrobial susceptibility status and the presence of resistance genes in intestinal commensal E. coli clones from clinically healthy pigs from one production unit with particular focus on effects of pheno- and/or genotypic resistance on different nominal and numerical intestinal colonization parameters. In addition, we compared the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and genotypes with the occurrence of virulence associated genes typical for extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli. RESULTS: In general, up to 72.1% of all E. coli clones were resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, kanamycin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole or tetracycline with a variety of different resistance genes involved. There was no significant correlation between one of the nominal or numerical colonization parameters and the absence or presence of antimicrobial resistance properties or resistance genes. However, there were several statistically significant associations between the occurrence of single resistance genes and single virulence associated genes. CONCLUSION: The demonstrated resistance to the tested antibiotics might not play a dominant role for an intestinal colonization success in pigs in the absence of antimicrobial drugs, or cross-selection of other colonization factors e.g. virulence associated genes might compensate "the cost of antibiotic resistance". Nevertheless, resistant strains are not outcompeted by susceptible bacteria in the porcine intestine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the local animal welfare committee of the "Landesamt fur Arbeitsschutz, Gesundheitsschutz und technische Sicherheit" Berlin, Germany (No. G0037/02)
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Mots clés AGROVOC
Informations bibliographiques
Editeur BioMed Central (BMC) ; ISOGEM
ISSN 1757-4749Cette notice bibliographique a été fournie par German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Découvrez la collection de ce fournisseur de données dans AGRIS