Europe-wide spatial trends in copper and imidacloprid sensitivity of macroinvertebrate assemblages | Europe-wide spatial trends in copper and imidacloprid sensitivity of macroinvertebrate assemblages
2024
Jupke, Jonathan F. | Sinclair, Thomas | Maltby, Lorraine | Aroviita, Jukka | Barešová, Libuše | Bonada, Núria | Elexová, Emília Mišíková | Ferreira, M. Teresa | Lazaridou, Maria | Lešťáková, Margita | Panek, Piotr | Pařil, Petr | Peeters, Edwin T. H. M. | Polášek, Marek | Sandin, Leonard | Schmera, Dénes | Straka, Michal | Schäfer, Ralf B.
Exposure to synthetic chemicals, such as pesticides and pharmaceuticals, afects freshwater communities at broad spatial scales. This risk is commonly managed in a prospective environmental risk assessment (ERA). Relying on generic methods, a few standard test organisms, and safety factors to account for uncertainty, ERA determines concentrations that are assumed to pose low risks to ecosystems. Currently, this procedure neglects potential variation in assemblage sensitivity among ecosystem types and recommends a single low-risk concentration for each compound. Whether systematic diferences in assemblage sensitivity among ecosystem types exist or their size, are currently unknown. Elucidating spatial patterns in sensitivity to chemicals could therefore enhance ERA precision and narrow a fundamental knowledge gap in ecology, the Hutchinsonian shortfall. We analyzed whether taxonomic turnover between feld-sampled macroinvertebrate assemblages of diferent broad river types across Europe results in systematic diferences in assemblage sensitivity to copper and imidacloprid. We used an extensive database of macroinvertebrate assemblage compositions throughout Europe and employed a hierarchical species sensitivity distribution model to predict the concentration that would be harmful to 5% of taxa (HC5) in each assemblage. Predicted HC5 values varied over several orders of magnitude. However, variation within the 95% highest density intervals remained within one order of magnitude. Diferences between the river types were minor for imidacloprid and only slightly higher for copper. The largest diference between river-type-specifc median HC5 values was a factor of 3.1. This level of variation is below the assessment factors recommended by the European Food Safety Authority and therefore would be captured in the current ERA for plant protection products. We conclude that the diferences in taxonomic composition between broad river types translate into relatively small diferences in macroinvertebrate assemblage sensitivity toward the evaluated chemicals at the European scale. However, systematic diferences in bioavailability and multi-stressor context were not evaluated and might exacerbate the diferences in the ecological efects of chemicals among broad river types in real-world ecosystems. Ecological risk assessment, Copper, Imidacloprid, Macroinvertebrates, Broad river types
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]publishedVersion
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Mots clés AGROVOC
Informations bibliographiques
Cette notice bibliographique a été fournie par Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Découvrez la collection de ce fournisseur de données dans AGRIS