Validity of FFQ Estimates of Total Sugars, Added Sugars, Sucrose and Fructose Compared to Repeated 24-h Recalls in Adventist Health Study-2 Participants
2021
Mericarmen Peralta | Celine Heskey | David Shavlik | Synnove Knutsen | Andrew Mashchak | Karen Jaceldo-Siegl | Gary E. Fraser | Michael J. Orlich
Sugar intake is a potentially important aspect of diet which has not previously been validated in the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2). We sought to validate the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) measurement of total sugars, added sugars, sucrose, and fructose against multiple 24-h dietary recalls (recalls) in AHS-2 participants. Food consumption data from a self-administered FFQ and six recalls from 904 participants were combined with nutrient profile data to estimate daily sugar intake. Validity was evaluated among all participants and by race. FFQ and recall means were compared and correlation coefficients (Spearman&rsquo:s, energy-adjusted log-transformed Pearson&rsquo:s, deattenuated Pearson&rsquo:s) were calculated. Mean total energy, total sugars, and fructose intake were higher in the FFQ, whereas added sugars and sucrose were higher in recalls. The energy-adjusted (log-transformed) deattenuated correlations among all participants were: total sugars (r = 0.42, 95% CI 0.32&ndash:0.52), added sugars (r = 0.50, 95% CI 0.36&ndash:0.59), sucrose (r = 0.32, 95% CI 0.23&ndash:0.42), and fructose (r = 0.50, 95% CI 0.40&ndash:0.59). We observed moderate validity for added sugars and fructose and low-moderate validity for total sugars and sucrose measured by the AHS-2 FFQ in this population. Dietary sugar estimates from this FFQ may be useful in assessing possible associations of sugars intake with health outcomes.
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Informations bibliographiques
Cette notice bibliographique a été fournie par Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Découvrez la collection de ce fournisseur de données dans AGRIS