Comparison of Methods to Select Candidates for High-Density Genotyping; Practical Observations in a Cattle Breeding Program
2022
Rudi A. McEwin | Michelle L. Hebart | Helena Oakey | Rick Tearle | Joe Grose | Greg Popplewell | Wayne S. Pitchford
Imputation can be used to obtain a large number of high-density genotypes at the cost of procuring low-density panels. Accurate imputation requires a well-formed reference population of high-density genotypes to enable statistical inference. Five methods were compared using commercial Wagyu genotype data to identify individuals to produce a &ldquo:well-formed&rdquo: reference population. Two methods utilised a relationship matrix (MCG and MCA), two of which utilised a haplotype block library (AHAP2 and IWS), and the last selected high influential sires with greater than 10 progeny (PROG). The efficacy of the methods was assessed based on the total proportion of genetic variance accounted for and the number of haplotypes captured, as well as practical considerations in implementing these methods. Concordance was high between the MCG and MCA and between AHAP2 and IWS but was low between these groupings. PROG-selected animals were most similar to MCA. MCG accounted for the greatest proportion of genetic variance in the population (35%, while the other methods accounted for approximately 30%) and the greatest number of unique haplotypes when a frequency threshold was applied. MCG was also relatively simple to implement, although modifications need to be made to account for DNA availability when running over a whole population. Of the methods compared, MCG is the recommended starting point for an ongoing sequencing project.
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Informations bibliographiques
Cette notice bibliographique a été fournie par Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Découvrez la collection de ce fournisseur de données dans AGRIS