Range and Wave Height Corrections to Account for Ocean Wave Effects in SAR Altimeter Measurements Using Neural Network

Compared to conventional pulse-limited altimeters (i.e., low-resolution mode, LRM), the synthetic aperture radar (SAR, i.e., high-resolution mode, HRM) altimeter offers superior precision and along-track resolution abilities. However, because the SAR altimeter relies on Doppler shifts caused by the relative movement between radar scattering points and the altimeter antenna, the geophysical parameters obtained by the SAR altimeter are sensitive to the direction of ocean wave movements driven by the wind and waves. Both practice and theory have shown that the wind and wave effects have a greater impact on HRM data than LRM. LRM values of range and significant wave height (SWH) from modern retracking are the best representations there are of these quantities, and this study aims to bring HRM data into line with them. In this study, wind and wave effects in SAR altimeter measurements were analyzed and corrected. The radar altimeter onboard the Sentinel-6 satellite is the first SAR altimeter to operate in an interleaved open burst mode. It has the capability of simultaneous generation of both LRM and HRM data. This study utilizes Sentinel-6 altimetry data and ERA5 re-analysis data to identify the influence of ocean waves. The analysis is based on the altimeter range and SWH differences between the HRM and LRM measurements with respect to different geophysical parameters derived from model data. Results show that both HRM range and SWH measurements are impacted by SWH and wind speed, and the HRM SWH measurements are also significantly impacted by vertical velocity. An upwave/downwave bias between HRM and LRM range is observed. To reduce wave impact on the SAR altimeter measurements, a back-propagation neural network (BPNN) method is proposed to correct the HRM range and SWH measurements. Based on Sentinel-6 measurements and ERA5 re-analysis data, our corrections significantly reduce biases between LRM and HRM range and SWH values. Finally, the accuracies of the sea surface height (SSH) and SWH measurements after correction are assessed using crossover analysis and compared against NDBC buoy data. The standard deviation (STD) of the HRM SSH differences at crossovers has no significant changes before (3.97 cm) and after (3.94 cm) correction. In comparison to the NDBC data, the root mean square error (RMSE) of the corrected HRM SWH data is 0.187 m, which is significantly better than that with no correction (0.265 m).