publishedVersion

Changes in the inflow of Atlantic Water (AW) and its properties to the Arctic Ocean bring more warm water, contribute to sea ice decline, promote borealisation of marine ecosystems, and affect biological and particularly primary productivity in the Eurasian Arctic Ocean. One of the two branches of AW inflow follows the shelf break north of Svalbard, where it dominates oceanographic conditions, bringing in heat, salt, nutrients and organisms. However, the interplay with sea ice and Polar Surface Water (PSW) determines the supply of nutrients to the euphotic layer especially northeast of Svalbard where AW subducts below PSW. In an effort to build up a time series monitoring the key characteristics of the AW inflow, repeat sampling of hydrography, macronutrients (nitrate, phosphate and silicate), and chlorophyll a (chl a) was undertaken along a transect across the AW inflow at 31◦E, 81.5◦N since 2012 — first during late summer and in later years during early winter. Such time series are scarce but invaluable for investigating the range of variability in hydrography and nutrient concentrations. We investigate linkages between late summer hydrographic conditions and nutrient concentrations along the transect and the preceding seasonal dynamics of surface chl a and sea ice cover in the region north of Svalbard. We find large interannual variability in hydrography, nutrients and chl a, indicating varying levels of nutrient drawdown by primary producers over summer. Sea ice conditions varied considerably between the years, impacting upper ocean stratification, light availability and potential wind-driven mixing, with a strong potential for steering chl a concentration over the productive season. Early winter measurements show variable efficiency of nutrient re-supply through vertical mixing when stratification was low, related to autumn wind forcing and sea ice conditions. While this re-supply elevates nutrient levels sufficiently for primary production, it likely happens too late in the season when light levels are already low, limiting the potential for autumn blooms. Such multidisciplinary observations provide insight into the interplay between physical, chemical and biological drivers in the marine environment and are key to understanding ongoing and future changes, especially at this entrance to the central Arctic Ocean.

The Barents Sea is undergoing rapid ocean warming with less sea ice and increased Atlantic inflow, shifting the pelagic ecosystem towards a more boreal one, a process referred to as Atlantification. While such changes have already been documented in the southern and central Barents Sea, less is known about the degree of Atlantification in the northern Barents Sea and Arctic Ocean. In this seasonal study, we identified the mesozooplankton biodiversity, abundance and biomass in the Northern Barents Sea along a transect with seven stations stretching from the central Barents Sea (76°N) across the shelf break and into the Arctic Ocean (82°N) in August and December 2019, and March, May and July 2021. The broad range of mesozooplankton taxa and sizes were collected by conducting duplicate depth-stratified tows using alternate nets of mesh-sizes 64 µm and 180 µm. The majority of zooplankton taxa were ubiquitous in the study area, but the abundances and life stages varied depending on the season, region and the dominant water mass. We identified three distinct biogeographical regions with different zooplankton diversity and seasonal dynamics; (i) south of the Polar Front, (ii) northern Barents Sea shelf, and (iii) shelf slope and Arctic Ocean. During summer, high abundances of Atlantic/boreal and cosmopolitan zooplankton, mainly Calanus finmarchicus, Metridia longa, Oithona similis and Microsetella norvegica were found just south of the Polar Front in the central Barents Sea. On the shelf, Arctic species, such as Calanus glacialis, Pseudocalanus spp., and Limacina helicina dominated year-round with relatively high and stable biomass. At the northernmost stations, peaks of C. finmarchicus and Oncaeidae (Triconia borealis and Oncaea spp.) occurred in winter, combined with bathypelagic species such as Paraeuchaeta spp., Scaphocalanus brevicornis, Spinocalanus spp., Gaetanus brevispinus and Heterorhabdus norvegicus. Hence, when comparing the mesozooplankton communities at the different locations and seasons, four distinct communities were identified: shelf winter, shelf spring, shelf summer, and Arctic Ocean. Stronger advection and increased northward expansion of Atlantic zooplankton species are anticipated in the future, which could impact the diversity of the more endemic and energy-richer Arctic zooplankton communities. | publishedVersion

The Barents Sea is undergoing rapid ocean warming with less sea ice and increased Atlantic inflow, shifting the pelagic ecosystem towards a more boreal one, a process referred to as Atlantification. While such changes have already been documented in the southern and central Barents Sea, less is known about the degree of Atlantification in the northern Barents Sea and Arctic Ocean. In this seasonal study, we identified the mesozooplankton biodiversity, abundance and biomass in the Northern Barents Sea along a transect with seven stations stretching from the central Barents Sea (76°N) across the shelf break and into the Arctic Ocean (82°N) in August and December 2019, and March, May and July 2021. The broad range of mesozooplankton taxa and sizes were collected by conducting duplicate depth-stratified tows using alternate nets of mesh-sizes 64 µm and 180 µm. The majority of zooplankton taxa were ubiquitous in the study area, but the abundances and life stages varied depending on the season, region and the dominant water mass. We identified three distinct biogeographical regions with different zooplankton diversity and seasonal dynamics; (i) south of the Polar Front, (ii) northern Barents Sea shelf, and (iii) shelf slope and Arctic Ocean. During summer, high abundances of Atlantic/boreal and cosmopolitan zooplankton, mainly Calanus finmarchicus, Metridia longa, Oithona similis and Microsetella norvegica were found just south of the Polar Front in the central Barents Sea. On the shelf, Arctic species, such as Calanus glacialis, Pseudocalanus spp., and Limacina helicina dominated year-round with relatively high and stable biomass. At the northernmost stations, peaks of C. finmarchicus and Oncaeidae (Triconia borealis and Oncaea spp.) occurred in winter, combined with bathypelagic species such as Paraeuchaeta spp., Scaphocalanus brevicornis, Spinocalanus spp., Gaetanus brevispinus and Heterorhabdus norvegicus. Hence, when comparing the mesozooplankton communities at the different locations and seasons, four distinct communities were identified: shelf winter, shelf spring, shelf summer, and Arctic Ocean. Stronger advection and increased northward expansion of Atlantic zooplankton species are anticipated in the future, which could impact the diversity of the more endemic and energy-richer Arctic zooplankton communities. | publishedVersion

The Barents Sea is undergoing rapid ocean warming with less sea ice and increased Atlantic inflow, shifting the pelagic ecosystem towards a more boreal one, a process referred to as Atlantification. While such changes have already been documented in the southern and central Barents Sea, less is known about the degree of Atlantification in the northern Barents Sea and Arctic Ocean. In this seasonal study, we identified the mesozooplankton biodiversity, abundance and biomass in the Northern Barents Sea along a transect with seven stations stretching from the central Barents Sea (76°N) across the shelf break and into the Arctic Ocean (82°N) in August and December 2019, and March, May and July 2021. The broad range of mesozooplankton taxa and sizes were collected by conducting duplicate depth-stratified tows using alternate nets of mesh-sizes 64 µm and 180 µm. The majority of zooplankton taxa were ubiquitous in the study area, but the abundances and life stages varied depending on the season, region and the dominant water mass. We identified three distinct biogeographical regions with different zooplankton diversity and seasonal dynamics; (i) south of the Polar Front, (ii) northern Barents Sea shelf, and (iii) shelf slope and Arctic Ocean. During summer, high abundances of Atlantic/boreal and cosmopolitan zooplankton, mainly Calanus finmarchicus, Metridia longa, Oithona similis and Microsetella norvegica were found just south of the Polar Front in the central Barents Sea. On the shelf, Arctic species, such as Calanus glacialis, Pseudocalanus spp., and Limacina helicina dominated year-round with relatively high and stable biomass. At the northernmost stations, peaks of C. finmarchicus and Oncaeidae (Triconia borealis and Oncaea spp.) occurred in winter, combined with bathypelagic species such as Paraeuchaeta spp., Scaphocalanus brevicornis, Spinocalanus spp., Gaetanus brevispinus and Heterorhabdus norvegicus. Hence, when comparing the mesozooplankton communities at the different locations and seasons, four distinct communities were identified: shelf winter, shelf spring, shelf summer, and Arctic Ocean. Stronger advection and increased northward expansion of Atlantic zooplankton species are anticipated in the future, which could impact the diversity of the more endemic and energy-richer Arctic zooplankton communities.

The Barents Sea is undergoing rapid ocean warming with less sea ice and increased Atlantic inflow, shifting the pelagic ecosystem towards a more boreal one, a process referred to as Atlantification. While such changes have already been documented in the southern and central Barents Sea, less is known about the degree of Atlantification in the northern Barents Sea and Arctic Ocean. In this seasonal study, we identified the mesozooplankton biodiversity, abundance and biomass in the Northern Barents Sea along a transect with seven stations stretching from the central Barents Sea (76◦N) across the shelf break and into the Arctic Ocean (82◦N) in August and December 2019, and March, May and July 2021. The broad range of mesozooplankton taxa and sizes were collected by conducting duplicate depth-stratified tows using alternate nets of mesh-sizes 64 µm and 180 µm. The majority of zooplankton taxa were ubiquitous in the study area, but the abundances and life stages varied depending on the season, region and the dominant water mass. We identified three distinct biogeographical regions with different zooplankton diversity and seasonal dynamics; (i) south of the Polar Front, (ii) northern Barents Sea shelf, and (iii) shelf slope and Arctic Ocean. During summer, high abundances of Atlantic/boreal and cosmopolitan zooplankton, mainly Calanus finmarchicus, Metridia longa, Oithona similis and Microsetella norvegica were found just south of the Polar Front in the central Barents Sea. On the shelf, Arctic species, such as Calanus glacialis, Pseudocalanus spp., and Limacina helicina dominated year-round with relatively high and stable biomass. At the northernmost stations, peaks of C. finmarchicus and Oncaeidae (Triconia borealis and Oncaea spp.) occurred in winter, combined with bathypelagic species such as Paraeuchaeta spp., Scaphocalanus brevicornis, Spinocalanus spp., Gaetanus brevispinus and Heterorhabdus norvegicus. Hence, when comparing the mesozooplankton communities at the different locations and seasons, four distinct communities were identified: shelf winter, shelf spring, shelf summer, and Arctic Ocean. Stronger advection and increased northward expansion of Atlantic zooplankton species are anticipated in the future, which could impact the diversity of the more endemic and energy-richer Arctic zooplankton communities.

Strong seasonality is a key feature of high-latitude systems like the Barents Sea. While the interannual variability and long-term changes of the Barents Sea are well-documented, the seasonal progression of the physical and biological systems is less known, mainly due to poor accessibility of the seasonally ice-covered area in winter and spring. Here, we use an extensive set of physical and biological in situ observations from four scientific expeditions covering the seasonal progression from late winter to late summer 2021 in the northwestern Barents Sea, from fully ice-covered to ice-free conditions. We found that sea ice meltwater and the timing of ice-free conditions in summer shape the environment, controlling heat accumulation, light and nutrient availability, and biological activity vertically, seasonally, and meridionally. In March and May, the ocean north of the Polar Front was ice-covered and featured a deep mixed layer. Chlorophyll-a concentrations increased from March to May along with greater euphotic depth, indicating the beginning of the spring bloom despite the absence of surface layer stratification. By July and in September, sea ice meltwater created a shallow low-density surface layer that strengthened stratification. In open water, chlorophyll-a maxima were found at the base of this layer as surface nutrients were depleted, while in the presence of ice, maxima were closer to the surface. Solar heating and the thickness of the surface layer increased with the number of ice-free days. The summer data showed a prime example of an Arctic-like space-for-time seasonal variability in the key physical and biological patterns, with the summer situation progressing northwards following sea ice retreat. The amount of sea ice melt (local or imported) has a strong control on the conditions in the northwestern Barents Sea, and the conditions in late 2021 resembled pre-2010 Arctic-like conditions with high freshwater content and lower ocean heat content. | acceptedVersion

Strong seasonality is a key feature of high-latitude systems like the Barents Sea. While the interannual variability and long-term changes of the Barents Sea are well-documented, the seasonal progression of the physical and biological systems is less known, mainly due to poor accessibility of the seasonally ice-covered area in winter and spring. Here, we use an extensive set of physical and biological in situ observations from four scientific expeditions covering the seasonal progression from late winter to late summer 2021 in the northwestern Barents Sea, from fully ice-covered to ice-free conditions. We found that sea ice meltwater and the timing of ice-free conditions in summer shape the environment, controlling heat accumulation, light and nutrient availability, and biological activity vertically, seasonally, and meridionally. In March and May, the ocean north of the Polar Front was ice-covered and featured a deep mixed layer. Chlorophyll-a concentrations increased strongly from March to May along with greater euphotic depth, indicating the beginning of the spring bloom despite the absence of surface layer stratification. By July and in September, sea ice meltwater created a shallow low-density surface layer that strengthened stratification. In open water, chlorophyll-a maxima were found at the base of this layer as surface nutrients were depleted, while in the presence of ice, maxima were closer to the surface. Solar heating and the thickness of the surface layer increased with the number of ice-free days. The summer data showed a prime example of an Arctic-like space-for-time seasonal variability in the key physical and biological patterns, with the summer situation progressing northwards following sea ice retreat. The amount of sea ice melt (local or imported) has a strong control on the conditions in the northwestern Barents Sea, and the conditions in late 2021 resembled pre-2010 Arctic-like conditions with high freshwater content and lower ocean heat content.

publishedVersion

The range limitation (>200 m) for high-frequency echosounders does not allow for complete multifrequency studies of the mesopelagic layers from vessel-mounted echosounders. The layers of mesopelagic fish and zooplankton in the Arctic region north of Svalbard (Spitsbergen) were studied using vessel-mounted echosounders and a profiling acoustic probe, using 38, 120, 200 and 333 kHz. Volume density estimates of mesopelagic fish have shown to be marginally higher with the probing system in relation with measured from the vessel-mounted echosounders at 38 kHz. This shows that the swimbladder resonance phenomenon is not occurring in low density layers with limited vertical migration. The use of the profiling probe allowed densities to be calculated with an in situ measured target strength (TS). In depths >200 m where high-frequency hull-mounted transducers cannot effectively reach, the profiling system measured a mixture of krill and amphipods down to 600 m. Vertical profiles of measured target categories, from vessel transducers and from the probing system are compared in relation to the biological sampling conducted during the survey. Profiling acoustics are shown to be a valuable tool to address some limitations in the current surveying methods for studying mesopelagic layers beyond the reach for high-frequency vessel-mounted systems.

publishedVersion

Fjord and shelf food webs are frequently supplemented by the advection of external biomass, which in high-latitude seas often comes in the form of lipid-rich copepods that can support a wide range of fish species, including Northeast Arctic cod (Gadus morhua). A seasonal match or mismatch at the lower trophic levels (phytoplankton and zooplankton) is central in determining how much energy and biomass is available for higher trophic levels (fish). Here, we quantify the inflow of the copepod Calanus finmarchicus into the Vestfjorden fjord system using high-resolution measurements of ocean currents and zooplankton (laser optical plankton counter). We evaluate a spatio-temporal match/mismatch between the phytoplankton bloom and Calanus and assess the input of advected copeods at the lower trophic level fjord and shelf food web based on an integrative approach employing stable isotope analyses (C, N), fatty acid trophic marker analyses, and biovolume spectrum analyses. Our results suggest two different sources of the Calanus population in the fjord/shelf system: one fraction overwintered locally and started ascending early to feed on the phytoplankton bloom that peaked around April 11. The other fraction had only recently (end of April) been and still was being advected from the oceanic overwintering habitats. Ca. 119 g C/s of Calanus were advected into the fjord, comparable to the biomass of Calanus advected into an Arctic fjord, and the mesozooplankton community was dominated by the copepod. The fjord food web was tightly coupled between the phytoplankton spring bloom, the local part of the Calanus population (trophic level 1.8–2.4) and cod larvae (high levels of wax esters). On the shelf, our results suggest that the impact of advected Calanus in the food web is at its starting point (low trophic level, large difference of δ¹³C of POM and Calanus). We highlight important factors that can contribute to the successful spawning of Northeast Arctic cod: an extended phytoplankton bloom that can support both locally and advected Calanus, which in turn can supply the essential nauplii prey for first-feeding cod larvae.

publishedVersion

In September 2016, a marine ecosystem survey covered all trophic levels from phytoplankton to seals in the Arctic Ocean to the west and north of Svalbard. At the ice edge, 26 harp seals were sampled to assess whether recent environmental changes had affected their diets and body condition by comparing our current results with previous investigations conducted 2–3 decades ago in the northern Barents Sea, when the ice edge was located much further south. Our results suggest that the body condition was slightly but significantly lower for one year and older seals in 2016 compared with seals sampled in the early 1990s. Furthermore, we confirmed previous findings that polar cod (Boreogadus saida) and the pelagic hyperiid amphipod Themisto libellula still dominate the seal diet. One consequence of current ice edge localisation north of Svalbard is that the water depth underneath is now 500 m and deeper, which probably explains the absence of bottom associated species, and the presence of species such as Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) as alternative species in addition to polar cod and T. libellula in the seal diets. Stable isotope data also suggest possible long-term importance in the seal diet of T. libellula and of low trophic level benthopelagic prey such as the squid Gonatus fabricii over mid-trophic level pelagic fishes, but with a strong component of small, benthopelagic fish such as blue whiting. The long-term importance of pelagic crustaceans was also suggested from the fatty acid analyses. Assessment of the abundance of prey showed that T. libellula was by far the most abundant prey species in the upper water layers, followed by krill (mainly Thysanoessa inermis), Atlantic cod and polar cod. Prey-preference analyses indicated that polar cod was the most preferred prey species for the seals. | publishedVersion

In September 2016, a marine ecosystem survey covered all trophic levels from phytoplankton to seals in the Arctic Ocean to the west and north of Svalbard. At the ice edge, 26 harp seals were sampled to assess whether recent environmental changes had affected their diets and body condition by comparing our current results with previous investigations conducted 2–3 decades ago in the northern Barents Sea, when the ice edge was located much further south. Our results suggest that the body condition was slightly but significantly lower for one year and older seals in 2016 compared with seals sampled in the early 1990s. Furthermore, we confirmed previous findings that polar cod (Boreogadus saida) and the pelagic hyperiid amphipod Themisto libellula still dominate the seal diet. One consequence of current ice edge localisation north of Svalbard is that the water depth underneath is now 500 m and deeper, which probably explains the absence of bottom associated species, and the presence of species such as Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) as alternative species in addition to polar cod and T. libellula in the seal diets. Stable isotope data also suggest possible long-term importance in the seal diet of T. libellula and of low trophic level benthopelagic prey such as the squid Gonatus fabricii over mid-trophic level pelagic fishes, but with a strong component of small, benthopelagic fish such as blue whiting. The long-term importance of pelagic crustaceans was also suggested from the fatty acid analyses. Assessment of the abundance of prey showed that T. libellula was by far the most abundant prey species in the upper water layers, followed by krill (mainly Thysanoessa inermis), Atlantic cod and polar cod. Prey-preference analyses indicated that polar cod was the most preferred prey species for the seals.

Here we present novel data on bacterial assemblages along a coast-fjord gradient in the Sognefjord, the deepest (1308 m) and longest (205 km) ice-free fjord in the world. Data were collected on two cruises, one in November 2012, and one in May 2013. Special focus was on the impact of advective processes and how these are reflected in the autochthonous and allochthonous fractions of the bacterial communities. Both in November and May bacterial community composition, determined by Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analyses (ARISA), in the surface and intermediate water appeared to be highly related to bacterial communities originating from freshwater runoff and coastal water, whereas the sources in the basin water were mostly unknown. Additionally, the inner part of the Sognefjord was more influenced by side-fjords than the outer part, and changes in bacterial community structure along the coast-fjord gradient generally showed higher correlation with environmental variables than with geographic distances. High resolution model simulations indicated a surprisingly high degree of temporal and spatial variation in both current speed and direction. This led to a more episodic/discontinuous horizontal current pattern, with several vortices (10–20 km wide) being formed from time to time along the fjord. We conclude that during periods of strong wind forcing, advection led to allochthonous species being introduced to the surface and intermediate layers of the fjord, and also appeared to homogenize community composition in the basin water. We also expect vortices to be active mixing zones where inflowing bacterial populations on the southern side of the fjord are mixed with the outflowing populations on the northern side. On average, retention time of the fjord water was sufficient for bacterial communities to be established. | publishedVersion

publishedVersion