Milk antimicrobial residues are a serious concern for the dairy industry. Residues of the tetracycline family of antimicrobials have been reported in market milk by investigators, using radioimmunoassay and microbial receptor technology (hereafter referred to as the Charm II test). In response to these reports, an investigation was conducted to determine the potential of 3 extra-label routes of oxytetracycline (OTC) administration to cause milk residues above the Food and Drug Administration safe value of 30 parts per billion (ppb). Lactating Holstein cows were administered OTC once by use of 1 of 3 routes: IV at 16.5 mg/kg of body weight (n = 6); IM at 11 mg/kg (n = 6); and intrauterine (IU) at 2 g in 500 ml of saline solution/cow (n = 6). Duplicate milk samples were collected at the milking prior to drug administration and for the next 13 milkings at 12-hour intervals. Concentrations of OTC in milk samples were analyzed by use of the Charm II test for tetracyclines (limit of OTC detection, approx 5 ppb) and were compared with concentrations determined by use of a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method (lower limit of OTC quantitation, approx 2 ppb). The potential for milk OTC residues above the Food and Drug Administration safe value of 30 ppb after treatment was considerably greater for the IV and IM routes, compared with the IU route. Mean peak OTC concentrations in milk at the first milking after treatment for the HPLC and Charm II tests were approximately 3,700 to 4,200 ppb for the IV route, 2,200 to 2,600 ppb for the IM route, and 186 to 192 ppb for the IU route, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analysis, based on milk OTC concentrations, indicated that the area under the curve (AUC) and milk maximal concentration (Cmax) differed significantly (P < 0.001) among routes of administration. The AUC was similar for IV and IM administrations; values for both were greater than the AUC for IU administration. The Cmax was greatest for IV, intermediate for IM, and least for IU administration. There were significant (P less than or equal to 0.01) differences in AUC between assay methods (Charm II vs HPLC) for the IV route. Concentrations of OTC in milk determined by the Charm II test were often greater than those determined by HPLC. Administration of OTC to lactating cows via these routes is extra-label drug use. Failure to withhold the product from early milkings of cows administered OTC by the IV or IM route should be considered a potential cause of OTC residues in market milk. Milk from nearly all cows contained OTC (< 30 ppb), the Food and Drug Administration safe level, by 120 hours after OTC administration. Use of appropriate withholding times and antibiotic residue testing is indicated to avoid OTC residues.

Using 7 penicillins (amoxicillin, ampicillin, methicillin, penicillin G, oxacillin, cloxacillin, and dicloxacillin), simultaneous and direct determination of residual penicillins in biological samples was carried out by use of bioassay and high-performance liquid chromatography with spectrophotometric or fluorometric detectors. By use of assay medium seeded with penicillin-sensitive Micrococcus luteus (ATCC No. 9341) as a test organism, we were able to detect penicillins even at low concentrations. All penicillins treated with 10 U of penicillinase/ml did not produce inhibition zones by disk testing, even at a concentration of 100 micrograms of penicillin/ml/assay plate. Using a mobile phase of acetonitrile:methanol:0.01M KH2PO4 (19:11:70, v/v/v; pH, 7.1), standard solutions of the penicillins were separated from each other by use of high-performance liquid chromatography analysis, producing symmetric peaks without tailing, each of which had a characteristic retention time. Simultaneous detection of residual penicillins in bovine serum, kidneys, and liver, for the 5 penicillins for which analysis was possible by use of the UV method, yielded recovery rates from 71.4 to 102.3%; for the 2 amino-penicillins, amoxicillin and ampicillin, which could only be detected by use of the fluorometric method, recovery rate ranged from 72.9 to 103%.

A radioimmunoassay test for tetracyclines (Charm II) was compared with high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) for detection of oxytetracycline (OTC) residues in milk samples from individual lactating cows. Oxytetracycline was administered by 1 of 3 routes (IV, IM, or intrauterine) to 21 lactating dairy cows. A total of 292 duplicate milk samples were collected from milkings before and through 156 hours after OTC administration. Concentration of OTC in these samples was determined by use of the Charm II test and an HPLC method with a lower limit of quantitation, approximately 2 ng of OTC/ml. Samples were also classified with respect to presence of OTC residues relative to the FDA safe concentration (less than or equal to 30 ng/ml), using the Charm II (by control point determination) and HPLC methods. There was a significant (P less than or equal to 0.05) difference between test methods in classification of milk samples with respect to presence or absence of OTC at the FDA safe concentration. A total of 48 of the 292 test results (16.4%) did not agree. Using the HPLC test results as the standard with which Charm II test results were compared, 47 false presumptive-violative test results and 1 false presumptive-nonviolative Charm II test result (a sample containing 31 ng of OTC/ml, as evaluated by HPLC) were obtained. The samples with false presumptive-violative Charm II results contained (less than or equal to 30 ng of OTC/ml, as evaluated by HPLC. In some respects, the Charm II test performed appropriately as a screening test to detect OTC residues in milk samples from individual cows. However, the tendency for the test to yield presumptive-violative test results at OTC concentrations lower than the FDA safe concentration (as evaluated by HPLC), suggests that caution should be exercised in using the test as the sole basis on which a decision is made to reject milk. As indicated by the manufacturer, presumptive-violative Charm II test results should be confirmed by additional testing Although not specifically evaluated, the tendency for misclassification of milk samples as presumptive-violative by the Charm II test may or may not occur in commingled milk, compared with milk samples from individual cows.

Eight Holstein cows, 4 inoculated intracisternally in 1 quarter of the mammary gland with Escherichia coli and 4 noninfected controls, were administered ceftiofur sodium (3 mg/kg of body weight, IV, q 12 hours) for 24 hours, beginning at 14 hours after inoculation of infected cows. All challenge-exposed cows became infected, with mean +/- SEM peak log10 bacterial concentration in milk of 5.03 +/- 0.69 colony-forming units/ml. The infection resulted in systemic signs (mean peak rectal temperature, 41.5 +/- 0.3 C; anorexia; signs of depression) and local inflammation (mean peak albumin concentration in milk, 7.89 +/- 1.71 mg/ml). Ceftiofur was detectable in milk from all challenge-exposed cows, compared with only 1 of 4 noninfected cows, and the mean period after inoculation that ceftiofur was detectable in milk was longer (P < 0.05) in infected (147.7 +/- 27.5 hours) than noninfected cows (1.3 +/- 1.3 hours). However, maximal ceftiofur concentration attained in milk for all cows was 0.28 micrograms/ml, and was 0.20 micrograms/ml or less for all but 2 milk samples collected for 10 days after challenge exposure. Mean serum concentration of ceftiofur peaked at 1.0 +/- 0.3 micrograms/ml and 0.7 +/- 0.1 micrograms/ml for infected and noninfected COWS, respectively. After each ceftiofur dose, mean peak and trough concentrations of ceftiofur in serum did not differ between groups; however, concentration of ceftiofur in serum was higher at 7 hours after each dose in noninfected cows, suggesting more rapid clearance of the drug in infected cows. Ceftiofur was not detected in serum (< 0.05 micrograms/ml) of any cow at or after 120 hours following inoculation of infected cows. Storage of serum samples at -20 C for 3 weeks resulted in a 98.8% decrease in ceftiofur activity, compared with that in fresh serum samples. Eighty-seven percent of this loss occurred 30 minutes after mixing serum and ceftiofur; thus, about 13% of the original activity was lost in storage. Storage of milk samples under similar conditions did not result in loss of ceftiofur activity. Despite acute inflammation, the dosage of ceftiofur used in this trial would not result in drug concentrations in milk above FDA safe concentrations, or above the reported minimum inhibitory concentration for coliform bacteria.