To understand the defense mechanism of Arundinaria spanostachya clonal populations in response to grazing by giant pandas, dynamic variations in A. spanostachya clonal population structure and biomass allocation in a wild giant panda habitat at the Liziping Nature Reserve were evaluated, as well as whether the clonal populations would be continuously used by the wild giant pandas. The population density of each age-class in the grazed and control plots after grazing (2014a and 2015a) was similar to that before grazing (2013a). The effects of grazing on the size-class and height-class structures were relatively lower. Before and after grazing, the perennial individuals showed the highest total biomass, followed by the biennial and annual individuals, and the maximum dry matter content in each module was found in the culm, followed by the branch and leaf. The dry matter content of A. spanostachya individuals increased as the age class increased, whereas the total water content decreased. The maximum water content allocation in the modules was observed in the culm, and no significant differences were found between the shoot and leaf. Thus, foraging by the wild giant pandas had no impact on the size-class and height-class structures and biomass allocation of A. spanostachya clonal populations, and the clonal populations have established an adaptive mechanism against grazing by giant pandas. After grazing, the A. spanostachya clonal populations showed greater self-adjustment ability to restore the status to that before grazing and, thus, continuously supply food for the giant pandas. Further management intervention of A. spanostachya clonal populations after the foraging of wild giant pandas is not needed, which has implications for understanding the impact of co-evolutionary mechanisms between giant panda and its staple bamboo species.

In response to seasonal variation in quality and quantity of available plant biomass, herbivorous foragers may alternate among different plant resources to meet nutritional requirements. Giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) are reliant almost exclusively on bamboo which appears omnipresent in most occupied habitat, but subtle temporal variation in bamboo quality may still govern foraging strategies, with population-level effects. In this paper, we investigated the possibility that temporal variation in the quality of this resource is involved in population regulation and examined pandas’ adaptive foraging strategies in response to temporal variation in bamboo quality. Giant pandas in late winter and early spring consumed a less optimal diet in Foping Nature Reserve, as the availability of the most nutritious and preferred components and age classes of Bashania fargesii declined, suggesting that bamboo may be a seasonally limiting resource. Most panda mortalities and rescues occurred during the same period of seasonal food limitation. Our findings raised the possibility that while total bamboo biomass may not be a limiting factor, carrying capacity may be influenced by subtle seasonal variation in bamboo quality. We recommend that managers and policy-makers should consider more than just the quantity of bamboo in the understory and that carrying capacity estimates should be revised downward to reflect the fact that all bamboos are not equal.