International audience | There is growing scientific and societal consciousness that the environmental risks and impacts of plant protection products (PPPs) cannot be properly assessed without considering ecosystem services. However, the science on this issue remains incomplete and fragmented, as recently illustrated in a collective scientific assessment that pointed out the limited knowledge on the risks and impacts of PPPs on soil ecosystem services, which are clearly overlooked. Beside soil ecosystem services, certain key players involved in these services are largely overlooked in the scientific literature on the risks and impacts of PPPs, namely soil microbial photosynthetic communities. Here, we followed the principles of evidence-based logic chain approaches to show the importance of considering these microorganisms when studying the impacts of PPPs on certain services provided by soil ecosystems, with a focus on regulating and maintenance services that play a role in the regulation of baseline flows and extreme events. Terrestrial microalgae and cyanobacteria are ubiquitous photosynthetic microorganisms that, together with other soil micro- and macro-organisms, play key roles in the ecosystem functions that underpin these ecosystem services. There is an extensive literature on the ecotoxicological effects of PPPs on different organisms including soil microorganisms, but studies concerning soil microbial photosynthetic communities are very scarce. However, there is scientific evidence that herbicides can have both direct and indirect impacts on these microbial photosynthetic communities. Given that they play key functional roles, we argue that soil microbial photosynthetic communities warrant greater attention in efforts to assess the environmental risks and impacts of PPPs and, ultimately, help preserve or restore the regulating and maintenance services provided by soil ecosystems.

International audience | Agricultural practices are a major cause of the current loss of biodiversity. Among postwar agricultural intensification practices, the use of plant protection products (PPPs) might be one of the prominent drivers of the loss of wildlife diversity in agroecosystems. A collective scientific assessment was performed upon the request of the French Ministries responsible for the Environment, for Agriculture and for Research to review the impacts of PPPs on biodiversity and ecosystem services based on the scientific literature. While the effects of legacy banned PPPs on ecosystems and the underlying mechanisms are well documented, the impacts of current use pesticides (CUPs) on biodiversity have rarely been reviewed. Here, we provide an overview of the available knowledge related to the impacts of PPPs, including biopesticides, on terrestrial vertebrates (i.e. herptiles, birds including raptors, bats and small and large mammals). We focused essentially on CUPs and on endpoints at the subindividual, individual, population and community levels, which ultimately linked with effects on biodiversity. We address both direct toxic effects and indirect effects related to ecological processes and review the existing knowledge about wildlife exposure to PPPs. The effects of PPPs on ecological functions and ecosystem services are discussed, as are the aggravating or mitigating factors. Finally, a synthesis of knowns and unknowns is provided, and we identify priorities to fill gaps in knowledge and perspectives for research and wildlife conservation.

Seaweeds hold significant potential for human nutrition due to its high content of essential minerals and trace elements. In Africa, the development of the blue economy promotes their sustainable exploitation. However, harmful elements such as arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and cadmium (Cd) can accumulate in seaweeds, posing potential health risks upon consumption. Meristotheca senegalensis and Hypnea musciformis, two seaweeds of economic interest in Senegal, were collected in various locations, and their concentrations of essential nutrients, heavy metals, and transition metals were analyzed. Notably, cadmium levels in all samples exceeded established toxicity thresholds. A health risk assessment was performed, evaluating non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks through estimated daily intakes, target hazard quotients, hazard indexes, and carcinogenic risks. For adults, a low daily intake of seaweed (0.1 g day-1) posed no significant health risk over long-term exposure. High (8 g day-1) and medium (4 g day-1) daily intake levels posed no risk for adults and children, respectively, over 6-month exposure. In addition, seaweed represents a valuable iron source for preventing deficiency in Senegalese populations. Such intake levels could be incorporated into agro-food products for trace element enrichment. Nevertheless, for children, site-specific selection is critical to avoid carcinogenic risks over prolonged exposure. Seaweed offers a valuable opportunity for addressing food and nutrition security as well as promoting economic growth within Africa’s blue economy. However, careful scientific evaluation, particularly regarding site selection, is essential to ensure safe and sustainable uses, especially in countries like those in Africa, where marine pollution monitoring is often limited.

International audience | Plant protection products (PPPs) have historically been one of the classes of chemical compounds at the frontline of raising scientific and public awareness of the global nature of environmental pollution and the role of trophic interactions in shaping the impacts of chemicals on ecosystems. Despite increasingly strong regulatory measures since the 1970s designed to avoid unintentional effects of PPPs, their use is now recognised as a driver of biodiversity erosion. The French Ministries for the Environment, Agriculture and Research commissioned a collective scientific assessment to synthesise the current science and knowledge on the impacts of PPPs on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Here we report a literature review of the state of knowledge on the propagation of PPP residues and the effects of PPPs in food webs, including biopesticides, with a focus on current-use PPPs. Currently used PPPs may be stronger drivers of the current biodiversity loss than the banned compounds no longer in use, and there have been far fewer reviews on current-use PPPs than legacy PPPs. We first provide a detailed overview of the transfer and propagation of effects of PPPs through trophic interactions in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. We then review cross-ecosystem trophic paths of PPP propagation, and provide insight on the role of trophic interactions in the impacts of PPPs on ecological functions. We conclude with a summary of the available knowledge and the perspectives for tackling the main gaps, and address areas that warrant further research and pathways to advancing environmental risk assessment.

International audience | Biocontrol solutions (macroorganisms, microorganisms, natural substances, semiochemicals) are presented as potential alternatives to conventional plant protection products (PPPs) because they are supposed to have lower impacts on ecosystems and human health. However, to ensure the sustainability of biocontrol solutions, it is necessary to document the unintended effects of their use. Thus, the objectives of this work were to review (1) the available biocontrol solutions and their regulation, (2) the contamination of the environment (soil, water, air) by biocontrol solutions, (3) the fate of biocontrol solutions in the environment, (4) their ecotoxicological impacts on biodiversity, and (5) the impacts of biocontrol solutions compared to those of conventional PPPs. Very few studies concern the presence of biocontrol solutions in the environment, their fate, and their impacts on biodiversity. The most important number of results were found for the organisms that have been used the longest, and most often from the angle of their interactions with other biocontrol agents. However, the use of living organisms (micro and macroorganisms) in biocontrol brings a specific dimension compared to conventional PPPs because they can survive, multiply, move and colonize other environments. The questioning of regulation stems from this specific dimension of the use of living organisms. Concerning natural substances, the few existing results indicate that while most of them have low ecotoxicity, others have a toxicity equivalent to or greater than that of the conventional PPPs. There are almost no result regarding semiochemicals. Knowledge of the unintended effects of biocontrol solutions has proved to be very incomplete. Research remains necessary to ensure their sustainability.

International audience | Constructed wetlands (CWs), originally designed to mitigate chemical water pollution, often host noticeable aquatic fauna. However, little is known about the impact of the contaminants circulating within CWs on this local fauna, questioning the role of CWs as ecological refuges or traps. We aimed to assess the potential of an agricultural CWs in northern France to act as an ecological trap for aquatic fauna and the potential consequences on wetland functioning. We made faunistic inventories of benthic macroinvertebrates, using litterbags, from March to June 2022 in two zones within the CWs with contrasting levels of agrochemical contamination and in one unpolluted comparison pond. We calculated community diversity and sensitivity indices (e.g., species at risk, SPEARpesticides index). We measured wetland functioning by monitoring the leaf-litter breakdown. Results showed that pesticide fluxes were related to community composition changes and had negative effects on taxonomic diversity (Shannon index) and functional traits (shredder/scraper feeding mode). The negative link between pesticides and the leaf-litter breakdown was less clear, mainly because of the high level of integration of this response. This study reveals that CWs under agrochemical pressure may act as potential ecological traps for benthic macroinvertebrates and highlights the relevance of studying this group as an early-warning indicator of chemical risk in nature-based solutions.

International audience | Plant protection products (PPP) are extensively used to protect plants against harmful organisms, but they also have unintended effects on non-target organisms, especially terrestrial invertebrates. The impact of PPP on ecosystem functions provided by these non-target invertebrates remains, however, unclear. The objectives of this article were to review PPP impacts on the ecosystem functions provided by pollinators, predators and parasitoids, and soil organisms; and to identify the factors that aggravate or mitigate PPP effects. The literature highlights that PPP alter several ecosystem functions: provision and maintenance of biodiversity, pollination, biotic interactions and habitat completeness in terrestrial ecosystems, and organic matter and soil structure dynamics. However, there are still a few studies dealing with ecosystem functions, with sometimes contradictory results, and consequences on agricultural provisioning services remain unclear. The model organisms used to assess PPP ecotoxicological effects are still limited, and should be expanded to better cover the wide functional diversity of terrestrial invertebrates. Data are lacking on PPP sublethal, transgenerational and “cocktail” effects, and on their multitrophic consequences. In empirical assessments, studies on PPP unintended effects should consider agricultural-pedoclimatic contexts because they influence the responses of non-target organisms and associated ecosystem functions to PPP. Modeling might be a promising way to account for the complex interactions among PPP mixtures, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.

International audience

Global models estimate that two-thirds of floating ocean plastic has accumulated in coastal areas since the 1950s, with Hawaiʻi's windward shores particularly vulnerable due to their proximity to the North Pacific Garbage Patch. Our quarterly surveys revealed that 91% of recovered plastic particles were buried below the surface (deeper than 2 cm), with most particles being small fragments (93%) ranging from 5.4 to 7.9 mm. This study offers new insights into subsurface plastic pollution, exposing a previously hidden vertical distribution. We observed significant variations in plastic abundance across depths, beaches, and sampling periods, along with a positive correlation between particle size and sand grain size. Additionally, through reconciliation science, we critically reflect on the cultural impacts of our research, emphasizing the importance of aligning plastic pollution studies with local community values and environmental stewardship.