Affiner votre recherche
Résultats 1691-1700 de 2,185
Agricultural and rural development for reducing poverty and hunger in Asia | In pursuit of inclusive and sustainable growth
2015
DGO; COM | Booklet | IFPRI2; | Non-PR
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]The Impact of Integrated Agricultural Research for Development on Collective Marketing among Smallholder Farmers of Southern Africa Texte intégral
2013
Nyikahadzoi, Kefasi | Siziba, Shephard | Mango, Nelson | Zamasiya, Byron | Adekunle, A.A.
Participatory definition of trait preference and pastorals’ indigenous knowledge on goat breeding strategy around Aysaita district, Ethiopia Texte intégral
2015
Misbah, F. | Belay, B. | Haile, Aynalem
Technology assessment for sustainable agricultural and rural development in the Asia-Pacific region
1994
Singh, R.B.
Israeli agricultural research programs in joint rural development projects. Summary
1975
Mendel, K. (Ministry of Agriculture, Bet Dagan (Israel). Agricultural Research Organization) | Bar-Lev, M. (Ministry of Agriculture, Rehovoth (Israel). Centre of International Agricultural Cooperation)
Public rural works for relief and development: a review of the Bangladesh experience
1993
Hossain, Mahabub | Akash, M. Mokaddem
Gender, household behavior, and rural development Texte intégral
2021
Doss, Cheryl | Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Gender, household behavior, and rural development Texte intégral
2021
Doss, Cheryl | Quisumbing, Agnes R.
Our understanding of decision-making within rural households has changed substantially since interest in intrahousehold decision-making emerged in the 1980s. Conventional wisdom, rooted in the unitary theory of the household, held that households are groups of individuals who have the same preferences and fully pool their resources (Becker 1981). Accumulating empirical evidence has shifted this concept of the household in which households decide “as one” to a “collective” model in which individual household members may have different preferences, may not completely pool resources, and may bargain over outcomes in both production and consumption (Haddad, Hoddinott, and Alderman 1997).
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Gender, household behavior, and rural development Texte intégral
2020
Doss, Cheryl; Quisumbing, Agnes R. | http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5429-1857 Quisumbing, Agnes
Our understanding of decision-making within rural households has changed substantially since interest in intrahousehold decision-making emerged in the 1980s. Conventional wisdom, rooted in the unitary theory of the household, held that households are groups of individuals who have the same preferences and fully pool their resources (Becker 1981). Accumulating empirical evidence has shifted this concept of the household in which households decide “as one” to a “collective” model in which individual household members may have different preferences, may not completely pool resources, and may bargain over outcomes in both production and consumption (Haddad, Hoddinott, and Alderman 1997). | PR | IFPRI4 | PHND
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Linkages between agriculture and the overall economy Texte intégral
1989
Islam, Nurul | http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0565-4735 Islam, Nurul
Non-PR | IFPRI4
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Targeting Research for Poverty Reduction in Marginal Areas of Rural Syria Texte intégral
2006
La Rovere, Roberto | Aw-Hassan, Aden A. | Turkelboom, Francis | Thomas, Richard
Agricultural research in marginal dry areas can contribute to reducing poverty through the development of technological, institutional and policy options for poor farmers. Such research should address diversified opportunities and development pathways. This article analyses the diversity of livelihood strategies of rural people living in the Khanasser Valley in northwestern Syria, an area that is typical of marginal drylands. It proposes an operational classification of households based on their different livelihood strategies, applying an integrated methodology within a Sustainable Livelihoods framework. Households are classified into three clusters: agriculturists, labourers and pastoralists. The article examines the diversity of livelihoods involved, and considers where and how research should be directed to have greatest impact on poverty. Given that rural households are not homogeneous but dynamic entities, with diverse assets, capabilities and opportunities, the definition of household typologies can help to target development research. The article concludes that while agriculturists benefit most, poor labourers with enough land can also gain from pro-poor agricultural research. The poorest households with little land, and pastoralists, benefit little or only indirectly.
Afficher plus [+] Moins [-]Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (Mozambique) endorsed Aflasafe during a worskhop organized by MASA and the Mozambique Institute of Agriculture Research (IIAM)
2019
CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health