Water is the most essential resource for food production and socioeconomic development worldwide. Currently, industry and agriculture are the most water consuming activities, creating high levels of pollution, and intensifying the scarcity of water especially in arid regions. The term “hydroSOStainable products” has been used to define those foodstuffs grown under irrigation strategies that involve optimized water management. A study to understand how consumers perceive options to save water in the food chain and how to identify the water sustainable products by a logo, was conducted in Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Spain and USA, with 600 consumers per country. In all countries, consumers think that the food categories in which it is possible to save the most water are those linked directly to agricultural products: (i) “grains and grain products” and (ii) “vegetables, nuts and beans”. Also, consumers do not associate processed products, such as snacks, with high water consumption, even though they come from agricultural products such as grains and require more processing. The logo was positively rated by consumers, especially by young generations. There is a need to properly inform consumers about water sustainability to gain their confidence in the hydroSOS logo.

To attain sustainable development in Latin Ameica and the Caribbean, where there is a strong dependence on commodity and food price development, priority attention towards energy, water, and food security is critical. In this literature and data analysis, we examined the baseline and trends of resource security based on the Water-Energy-Food Nexus concept. A performance index was developed to evaluate the progress in water, energy, and food security of the region, and a nexus-based index was developed to evaluate the inter-linkages of these resources. Finally, critical issues and challenges for sustainable development were addressed. Results showed that an unprecedented amount of infrastructure is needed to address increasing energy consumption. Emphasis should be placed on gradually replacing high carbon-sources that produce electricity with low carbon-energy systems and clean power production. Results also showed that water scarcity, given unequal distributions of rainfall, will be aggravated by changing climate conditions; improvements in water governance as well as water and sanitation provisions are needed. The region is a net exporter of food, at the expense of water availability and greenhouse gas emissions, and suffers from structural constraints. It is important to foster novel agricultural practices and sustainable food systems.

Currently, the security of basic resources such as water, energy, and food is regarded as essential for sustainable development. Nonetheless, population growth, economic development, and changing consumption patterns have caused stress on these resources. It is expected that, in the near future, in many parts of the world, it will be challenging to satisfy the demand of the population and the access to essential services. Assessing the availability and access to natural resources allows for making projections of future scenarios and, in this sense, developing policies to mitigate deficiencies in all these sectors. This work presents an approach to assess the progress on the water–energy–food nexus security through an index that involves availability, accessibility, and sustainability indicators of a region over a time period. The evaluation considering the Sustainable Development Goals allows for identifying vulnerabilities associated with the water–energy–food nexus. The state of Sonora in Mexico was selected as a case study because of its unequal distribution and accessibility of resources. Results show that water, energy, and food access is not at risk, but the importation of resources to meet the demand of the state makes the nexus unsustainable because the availability of resources is not enough to satisfy the services of the population. Nevertheless, projections for 2030 show slight improvements in the water–energy–food nexus security.

The social relations and biophysical flows that link water, food, and energy systems are said to form a ‘nexus’. Efforts to steer or otherwise exert influence on decisions that impact upon these nexus links, including to ignore them, take place at multiple levels, vary in complexity, and have implications for who benefits and who is burdened by those relations and flows. This paper examines how nexus links have been governed, using four medium- to large-scale water infrastructure projects in Laos and Thailand as probes into problematic issues of coordination, anticipation, inclusion, and attribution. Project documents, media reports, and published analyses were coded to extract information about nexus links, narratives, and decisions. Nexus interactions were summarized using a novel symbolic notation and then classified along a scale of increasing structural complexity as pairs, chains, and loops. The key finding from the analysis of the four projects was that nexus governance was fragmented, reactive, exclusive, and opaque. Coordination among ministries was limited with inter-ministerial bodies, and integrated development plans ineffective at guiding project design or operation decisions in the presence of bureaucratic competition. Anticipation of cross-sectoral concerns was rare, despite scope to identify them early in feasibility studies, and assessment activities; instead they were only acknowledged after public pressure. Inclusion of the needs of vulnerable and affected groups was limited, although poverty alleviation, and other social benefits were a significant element in project justification narratives. Attribution of responsibility was difficult as many key decisions took place behind closed doors, while project information was withheld, raising further governance issues of transparency and accountability. Structural complexity in the nexus links made addressing governance problems even more challenging.

Foodborne bacterial infection poses a serious threat to human health. As most diseases are caused by living bacteria, real-time assessment of bacterial viability is vitally important to the public health sector. Herein, we developed a simple and novel colorimetric assay based on the Glucose oxidase (GOD)/Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) bienzyme system for real-time monitoring of bacterial viability in food and drinking water. This bienzyme system is free of any chemical synthesis and only requires 3 sample handling steps. The color response is easily observable with the naked eye or recordable with a smartphone for precise determination of bacterial viability. The proposed strategy was validated with various bacteria both Gram-positive and Gram-negative, indicating its capability for broad-spectrum bacteria viability detection. Therefore, the proposed strategy shows promise for rapid and reliable quality control in food and drinking water.

In Japan, strategies for ensuring food safety have been developed without reliable scientific evidence on the relationship between foodborne diseases and food sources. This study aimed to provide information on the proportions of foodborne diseases caused by seven major causative pathogens (Campylobacter spp., Salmonella, enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli [EHEC], Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Clostridium perfringens, Staphylococcus aureus, and norovirus) attributed to foods and to explore factors affecting changes in these source attribution proportions over time using analysis of outbreak surveillance data. For the calculation of the number of outbreaks attributed to each source, simple-food outbreaks were assigned to the single-food category in question, and complex-food outbreaks were classified under each category proportional to the estimated probability. During 2007 to 2018, 8,730 outbreaks of foodborne diseases caused by seven pathogens were reported, of which 6,690 (76.6%) were of unknown source. We estimated the following source attribution proportions of foodborne diseases: chicken products (80.3%, 95% uncertainty interval [UI] 80.1 to 80.4) for Campylobacter spp.; beef products (50.1%, UI 47.0 to 51.5) and vegetables (42.3%, UI 40.9 to 45.5) for EHEC; eggs (34.6%, UI 27.8 to 41.4) and vegetables (34.4%, UI 27.8 to 40.8) for Salmonella; finfish (50.3%, UI 33.3 to 66.7) and shellfish (49.7%, UI 33.3 to 66.7) for V. parahaemolyticus; grains and beans (57.8%, UI 49.7 to 64.9) for S. aureus; vegetables (63.6%, UI 48.5 to 74.6), chicken products (12.7%, UI 4.6 to 21.5), and beef products (11.1%, UI 8.5 to 13.1) for C. perfringens; and shellfish (75.5%, UI 74.7 to 76.2) for norovirus. In this study, we provide the best available evidence-based information to evaluate the link between foodborne diseases and foods. Our results on source attribution for Campylobacter spp. and EHEC suggest that the strict health regulations for raw beef were reflected in the proportions of these diseases attributed to this food.

With growing populations and changing climate, the food, energy and water (FEW) security have become a global issue. In response, the concept of FEW nexus in which the interdependency between FEW sectors are taken into account in order to effectively manage the resources and provide FEW security has emerged. Thus, in order to understand the interdependency between FEW sectors a thorough quantitative framework is necessary. Although there are numerous studies on FEW nexus, there is limited research on developing mathematical equations to model the FEW nexus. The goal of this study was to develop an input-output (IO) model to quantify the interdependency between FEW sectors in the Pacific Northwest. The FEW sectors were divided into 21 subsectors and IO model was used to quantify the total output of each subsector. Intensity coefficients were calculated and further broken down to technology coefficients and allocation coefficients. The uncertainty analysis was used to quantify the effect of variation in technology coefficients and allocation coefficients on output of each subsector and the results showed that these two distributions are significantly different. The results of sensitivity analysis showed that agricultural crops, especially alfalfa has the highest sensitivity to water and energy consumption due to the fact that alfalfa production is energy and water intensive. The multi-objective optimization was used to minimize the cost and environmental impact of FEW system and the results showed that in order to minimize the cost and environmental impacts, more surface water and hydroelectricity and wind electricity should be utilized.

In the last decade, the debate on the governance of water, energy, and food (WEF) has intensified, spurring the emergence of the term “nexus governance.” In general, the reduction of trade-offs and construction of synergies between WEF have been placed on the scientific, political, and economic agenda. However, although increasingly used, it is difficult to find a clear meaning and definition of what the term represents. Based on a systematic literature review (SLR), using text-mining and machine learning algorithms, this article investigates what are the conceptual basis of the nexus governance debate, and attempts to clarify the main themes, networks, and gaps within this literature. The analysis is based on quantitative and qualitative methods, combining social network analysis (SNA) and discourse analysis (DA). The results highlighted that twenty-four governance-related concepts support this literature, breaking down into eight groups: water and basin governance; environmental and systems governance; risk and resource security governance; economic governance; global governance; urban governance; integrative and cooperative governance; and “epistemic” and transdisciplinary governance.

With the implementation of the “Grain-for-Green” program, artificial vegetation was introduced on the Loess Plateau, which resulted in high soil water content (SWC) depletion. Currently, lack of soil water recharge is one of the most serious challenges on the Loess Plateau. Soil drying and wetting processes are critical for the sustainability of soil water recycling, but this has not been well studied. There is also a lack of physical definition of the upper bound SWC of dried soil layers (DSL). In this study, soil water dynamics – the change of SWC affected by precipitation and vegetation transpiration – were studied under converted vegetation. In-situ SWC measurements from the 0–5 m or 0–8 m deep profile over consecutive wet years (from 2016 to 2018 with an average precipitation of 660.9 mm) were analyzed to understand soil water depletion and restoration processes. Results showed distinct differences in soil water dynamics in the soil profiles and soil water balances under different vegetation types. SWC under continuous perennial alfalfa (Medicago sativa) had greater fluctuations between 0 and 300 cm than below 300 cm, and a DSL was observed below 300 cm. After converting from alfalfa to soybean (Glycine max), SWC increased greatly during the three wet years. Soil water storage (S) increased at an average rate of 35.8 mm year⁻¹ m⁻¹ within the top 500 cm of the soil profile, average evapotranspiration (ET) was 482.0 mm year⁻¹, and maximum restoration depth of soil water extended to 660 cm. However, SWC gradually decreased over time after replacing food crop with alfalfa. S declined at an average rate of 21.4 mm year⁻¹ m⁻¹ within the top 500 cm of the soil profile, average ET was 680.4 mm year⁻¹ and the maximum depth of soil water depletion extended to 360 cm. These results suggest that SWC in deep layers can be depleted and replenished quickly, and the processes were dominated by vegetation types and precipitation. Taking vegetation types and soil texture into consideration, the calculation of upper bound SWC of DSL was redefined. Given the long-term effects of high water demand from vegetation such as alfalfa on the soil water balance, ET of vegetation should be reduced through conversion to less water-intensive vegetation types or biomass control (i.e. reduced planting density appropriately) in arid areas of the Loess Plateau.

The energy-water nexus is a concept widely established but rarely applied to product and, in particular, to food and beverage products, which have a great influence on greenhouse gases emissions. The proposed method considers the main nexus aspects in addition to other relevant aspects such as climate change, which is deeply linked with energy and water systems, and assessing process as well as product. In this framework, this study develops an integrated index (IWECN) that combines life cycle assessment (LCA) and linear programming (LP) to assess energetic, water and climate systems, enabling the identification of those products with minors energetic and water intensity and climate change effects and helping to the decision-making process and to the development of eco-innovation measures. In this case, the product assessed was one bottle (70 cl) of gin and two main hotspots were identified: the production of the glass bottle and the energy requirements of the distillation stage. Based on that, several eco-innovation strategies were proposed: the use of photovoltaic solar energy as energy source and the substitution of the glass bottle by a plastic one and by a tetra brick. The nexus results indicated that the use of solar photovoltaic energy and plastic as bottle material was the best alternative decreasing 58% the IWECN value of the production of one bottle of gin. The sensitivity analysis presented a strong preference for photovoltaic solar energy in comparison with electric power and for the reduction of the glass bottle weight or its substitution by a plastic bottle. The use of the IWECN index is extendable to any product with the aim of facilitating the decision-making process in the development of more sustainable products to introduce them in new green markets.