Governance conditionality and the reform of multilateral development finance: the roleof the Group of Eight
2002
C. Santiso
This paper sets out to examine the international financial institutions' (IFIs’) efforts at strengthening good governance indeveloping countries and emerging markets.The debate on the role of IFIs has thus far mainly focused on the quantitative aspect of conditionality, oscillating between concerns over how much is too much and how much is enough. Less attention has been paid to the manner in which conditionality has been applied and the contents of the IFIs policy prescriptions.While the World Bank has significantly stretched its policy frontiers by endorsing “good governance” as a core element of its development strategy and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has integrated concerns over poverty reduction in its lending operations and corporate policies, both institutions continue to rely on the same instruments of punitive conditionality to promotegovernance reform and institutional development.The paper argues that the quality of governance is ultimately attributable to its democratic content. Therefore, for the Bank to substantially improve good governance in borrowing countries and reinvent itself, it will need to explicitly address issues of power, politics and democracy. The Bank should abandon the belief deeply anchored in its bureaucratic ethos that governance work can be restricted to technocratic improvements, thereby circumventing political economy factors.The paper proposes a radical reform of the governance ofmultilateral development finance by shifting to an ex post form of incentive conditionality aimed at rewarding good performance and based on national ownership. [adapted from author]
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Ключевые слова АГРОВОК
Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил Institute of Development Studies