Tertiary and quaternary structural differences between two genetic variants of bovine casein by small-angle X-ray scattering
Pessen, H. | Kumosinski, T.F. | Farrell, H.M. Jr | Brumberger, H.
The casein complexes of bovine milk consist of four major protein fractions, alpha s1, alpha s2, beta, and kappa. Colloidal particles of casein (termed micelles) contain inorganic calcium and phosphate; they are very roughly spherical with an average radius of 650 angstrom. Removal of Ca2+ leads to the formation of smaller protein aggregates (submicelles) with an average radius of 94 angstrom. Two genetic variants, A and B, of the predominant fraction, alpha s1-casein, result in milks with markedly different physical properties, such as solubility and heat stability. To investigate the molecular basis for these differences, small-angle X-ray scattering was performed on the respective colloidal micelles and submicelles. Scattering curves for submicelles of both variants showed multiple Gaussian character; data for the B variant were previously interpreted in terms of two concentric regions of different electron density, i.e., a "compact" core and a relatively "loose" shell. For the submicelle of A, there was a third Gaussian, reflecting a negative contribution due to interparticle interference. Molecular parameters for submicelles of both A and B are in agreement with hydrodynamic data in the literature. Data for the micelles, for which scattering yields cross-sectional information, were fitted by a sum of three Gaussians for both variants; for these, the corresponding two lower radii of gyration represent the two concentric regions of the submicelles, while the third reflects the average packing of submicelles within the micellar cross section. Most of the molecular parameters obtained showed small but consistent differences between A and B, but for submicelles within the micelle several differences were particularly notable: A has a greater molecular weight for the "compact" region of the constituent submicelle (82,000 vs 60,000) and a much greater submicellar packing number (6:1 vs 3:1). Reasons for these and other differences are to be sought in sequence differences and in differences in calcium-binding sites and charge distribution.
Показать больше [+] Меньше [-]Ключевые слова АГРОВОК
Библиографическая информация
Эту запись предоставил National Agricultural Library